KDPPatsfan85
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2008
- Messages
- 7,686
- Reaction score
- 10,709
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.More and more I'm starting to think that the system we run doesn't fit the market of WRs that is coming out of college.
It's hard to argue with the results in terms of wins but our woeful inability to find and develop rookie WRs has to tie into how complex our system is. On paper I think it makes a ton of sense but after a certain point of whiffing on WRs with picks in the top 3 rounds maybe it's time to start considering a system that works better with what's available.
At some point I've got to wonder if our system requires passing on guys like Metcalf and Deebo Samuel maybe there's something fundamentally wrong in terms of fit for today's college receiver.
There have been seven WR's who were SB MVP's.
BB drafted two of them.
Because we don't select WRs in the draft. We select half as many as other teams.
Pick a team, and I'll do the comparison. Off the top of my head, the Bears (not exactly an offensive juggernaut): 23 WRs drafted during the Belichick era. The Patriots? 9.
We just don't expend resources drafting WRs.
Of those 9 we've chosen, only 4 showed ability to play (two were top WRs in the league, one was a good #2, and one had a career ending injury [Edelman, Branch, Givens, Mitchell]).
Then you look at Bears:
Good picks: Marty Booker, Alshon Jeffrey
Middling picks, backups: Justin Gage, Bobby Wade, Bernard Berrian
Young players, the book is not yet written on them: Anthony Miller, Darnell Mooney
Wasted Picks: Sulecio Sanford, D'Wayne Bates, Frank Murphy, Desmond White, David Terrell, John Capel, Jamin Elliott, Aerise Currie, Mark Bradley, Marcus Monk, Earl Bennett, Derek Kinder, John Knox, Joaquin Iglesias, Marquess Wilson, Kevin White, Dan Braverman, Javon Wims, Riley Ridley
23 picks: 2 receivers who are top WRs in the league, 3 backup or #2 types, 19 wasted picks. 2 guys who are young.
If Belichick had spent as many picks as the Bears have, I suspect he would have drafted at least 4 more solid WRs, if not more.
Why are you comparing us to the Bears...
.
I know this has been brought up many times but it has a lot more to do with us whiffing on the prospect than the system.More and more I'm starting to think that the system we run doesn't fit the market of WRs that is coming out of college.
It's hard to argue with the results in terms of wins but our woeful inability to find and develop rookie WRs has to tie into how complex our system is. On paper I think it makes a ton of sense but after a certain point of whiffing on WRs with picks in the top 3 rounds maybe it's time to start considering a system that works better with what's available.
At some point I've got to wonder if our system requires passing on guys like Metcalf and Deebo Samuel maybe there's something fundamentally wrong in terms of fit for today's college receiver.
I explained why. I said pick any team off the top of your head for a comparison. So I picked the Bears. Here, I'll do it again: Raiders
25 draft picks expended, almost 3x as many as the Patriots.
They've only hit on 2 guys, Amari Cooper (who they traded away) & Jerry Porter who was a middling guy, 2nd receiver. They also 4 WRs from the last year or so who are very young (Henry Ruggs, Edwards, Bowden).
I would say check out the Steelers but that was already talked about and clearly established that apples for apples the Steelers draft better within the same range of picks. Even adjusting for difference in pick volume
.
The Steelers spend a top 100 pick nearly every year on WR. It’s obscene. Since 2007 they have drafted 13 WR’s in the first three rounds of the draft.Because we don't select WRs in the draft. We select half as many as other teams.
Pick a team, and I'll do the comparison. Off the top of my head, the Bears (not exactly an offensive juggernaut): 23 WRs drafted during the Belichick era. The Patriots? 9.
We just don't expend resources drafting WRs.
Of those 9 we've chosen, only 4 showed ability to play (two were top WRs in the league, one was a good #2, and one had a career ending injury [Edelman, Branch, Givens, Mitchell]).
Then you look at Bears:
Good picks: Marty Booker, Alshon Jeffrey
Middling picks, backups: Justin Gage, Bobby Wade, Bernard Berrian
Young players, the book is not yet written on them: Anthony Miller, Darnell Mooney
Wasted Picks: Sulecio Sanford, D'Wayne Bates, Frank Murphy, Desmond White, David Terrell, John Capel, Jamin Elliott, Aerise Currie, Mark Bradley, Marcus Monk, Earl Bennett, Derek Kinder, John Knox, Joaquin Iglesias, Marquess Wilson, Kevin White, Dan Braverman, Javon Wims, Riley Ridley
23 picks: 2 receivers who are top WRs in the league, 3 backup or #2 types, 19 wasted picks. 2 guys who are young.
If Belichick had spent as many picks as the Bears have, I suspect he would have drafted at least 4 more solid WRs, if not more.
18 picks for the Steelers over the same period. They've had a lot of busts. They've had 8 wins, 10 busts. And outside of Antonio Brown (the only superstar on the Steelers and Patriots over this period), their wins (of the 8 WRs) have been no better than Edelman or Deion Branch. Not to mention the fact that the Steelers are widely considered the best WR drafters in the entire NFL.
I actually went through this team by team and saw that the Patriots are not an outlier. They just don't draft receivers.
One of the few that is like the Patriots is the Chargers. They don't draft them either.