Wordsmyth
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2012
- Messages
- 3,637
- Reaction score
- 5,181
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.All I did was show an example where he was correct and another where he was wrong. When you write a lot of articles about the election is a near lock at 90%+ and your whole website is based on predicting, people are going to call you out on it.You're still doing the same thing @luuked was calling people out for. Acting as if a 9% chance is somehow guaranteed not to happen. That's still roughly 1 time in 11, for crying out loud, which is not a small thing. I doubt you'd be "Woo-hoo! Nothing to worry about!" if a doctor told you you had a 9% chance of coming down with some nasty disease.
That’s a terrible example. That would’ve applied during the event, while it was actually taking place. His whole predictive model is based on guessing beforehand.What were the Pats chances to win the SB against the Falcons down 3-28 ? Are all bookies dunces ?
That’s a terrible example. That would’ve applied during the event, while it was actually taking place. His whole predictive model is based on guessing beforehand.
I’m simply asking how this applies to the 28-3 super bowl example, where the in-game odds change drastically? If someone were to wager on ATL winning a game they were up 28-3 at the end of the third quarter, they would have to put up thousands of dollars for the opportunity to win 100 bucks.It's actually based on aggregate polling, with some historical trends and curbs added (openly, with methodology explained). Not sure what else you could ask any prognosticator (he's not a pollster) to do.
Serious question: is the 2018 Houston Texans schedule the easiest you've ever seen?
@ New England
@ Tennessee
vs NY Giants
@ Indianapolis
vs Dallas
vs Buffalo
@ Jacksonville
vs Miami
@ Denver
@ Washington
vs Tennessee
vs Cleveland
vs Indianapolis
@ NY Jets
@ Philadelphia
vs Jacksonville
The AFC South is garbage, and they happen to playing the garbage NFC East, plus they're playing a last place schedule and get Cleveland and Denver. This is a team that should win 8-9 games with a normal schedule, but there's a serious possibility they'll win 12+.
I think Houston is legitimate enough to where they can make some noise. The addition of Demaryius Thomas opposite Deandre Hopkins helps that offense, which had become more explosive since Watson returned to health.Yeah: realize that too can't believe I will be rooting for the Browns and the Colts two Teams that are playing decent. But that Houston Defense lead by JJ Watt seems to be back they can also run the Football. Remember what Bill Pracells once said " IF you can run the football and play Good Defense you are going to win a lot of games."
It hurts their chances for sure. They just lost one of their top offensive players, so it’s quite possible that they lose a game and ultimately lose HFA. By doing such, they obviously lose the inside track to the SB.So ...
I'm wondering how much the loss of Kareem Hunt hurts KCY's chances of winning out and securing HFA.
I mean, in case anyone finds the "Playoff Seeding" thread.
So ...
I'm wondering how much the loss of Kareem Hunt hurts KCY's chances of winning out and securing HFA.
I mean, in case anyone finds the "Playoff Seeding" thread.
Why would Kansas City need to lose 2 games, let alone “2+?” The Pats need them to lose once.I doubt it makes much difference. The chances they lose 2+ are very slim, they’re too good on offense even without Hunt. The chances the Pats win out are also very slim considering their schedule and how bad they look at times. There are also scenarios where KC falters and Houston or Pittsburgh (or both) end up with byes. Too many unlikely things have to happen for the Pats to get the 1 seed and it seems even money that they even end up with the 2.
Why would Kansas City need to lose 2 games, let alone “2+?” The Pats need them to lose once.
Yeah, I just didn’t get the “2+” comment, that’s all.If the Pats win out, one KCY loss is all it takes. If the Pats lose one more - which is apparently likely in McMurtry's opinion - then KCY would need to lose two games for the Pats to tie them (and win HFA on the head-to-head tiebreaker).
the steelers game is big, but then again they all are
11-4-1 is a real possibility with NO and NE remaining. 10-5-1 if they drop two.Steelers have a brutal remaining schedule They will be lucky to be 11-5.