Not to make another Brady v Rodgers thread but

[Tony2046]

I don't think that list is as damning as you think. I mean Russel Wilson is a pretty good QB. And Bridgewater wasn't a terrible one.

Really I think the list tells you that mobile non-pocket QBs will tend to wait longer before throwing it... not exactly a mind blowing observation.

Wilson is a good QB. Rodgers is a great QB. Neither are better than Brady.

Brady has been the, if not one of the, league leaders in Time to throw every year. He can read a defense and get rid of the ball in an average of 2 to 2.5 seconds consistently. Brady will search for the matchup he's looking for, make an audible, snap the ball, look off the safety and throw a strike in under 2.5 seconds.

Brady has excellent communication with his receivers. Numerous times you'll see Brady throw a ball before the receiver makes his cut.

So that's the "system". Brady and his receivers knowing how to quickly attack the opposing defense every single play.

Aaron is a great QB. No doubt. He'll snap the ball, run around, find the open guy and deliver a strike with elite accuracy. That's why defenses like to play man to man against AR.

That's his system and it works but just not as well as Brady's.

 

[Edelmania]

Brady hands the ball off when he has to. He does what he has to do to win not get statistics. Thats why Blount had 18 rushing touchdowns last year. Also he is often playing with the lead so he can run more and let off the pedal in the fourth, Rodgers plays with the lead too but not as much, in fact he was really struggling the first half of last season.

 

[Tony2046]

Two statisticians go hunting and see their prey. The first misses left by 5 ft. The second misses right by 5 ft. They exclaim: "We got it!