A lot to unpack here.
That's a very heavy handed reaction on the part of the NFL.
I would have thought something along the lines of "we're not cool with that Ian, don't do that again" would suffice.
Maybe there's more to the story, some underlying tension between NFL and Ian that we don't know about.
One of the things the public likes about NFL is that social media accounts are supposed to allow for more expression instead of being organs of outfits like the NFL.
As usual, NFL has no understanding of such and uses a heavy hand, presumably because they want absolute control over anything that has to do with advertising.
The manscaping ads have shown up on a lot of the podcasts I listen to and I gotta say they have crossed the line from suggestive and funny to explicit and gross.
I really don't want to hear about how Micheal Lombardi trims his ball hair in the middle of a sports podcast.
Hopefully their ads will disappear just like the "ball park underwear" ones did already.
nypost.com
