Which may have had the consequence of avoiding WRs with outstanding futures in the NFL. Maybe, maybe not.
But you’re missing my point, which is that the anti-Bill trait that matters when drafting WRs is having future success in the NFL, not having a big mouth.
Being anti-Bill by having a big mouth, but not anti-Bill by failing as an NFL WR is nothing to celebrate. Seems some on here are so hung up on being anti-Bill that they think it is, or would be, enough to be celebrating before the results are in.