Kontradiction
On my retirement tour.
PatsFans.com Supporter
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2023 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 68,279
- Reaction score
- 76,724
Do you have a job or a wife? I'd be fascinated to know how your "I've been proven correct" line works in other circumstances where you definitely haven't been proven correct but say it anyway.
Ah, the ad hom. Always lets me know the opposition is waving the white flag. I have a job, but no wife. Just a girlfriend for now. Thanks for your interest.
At times, Brady locks onto one receiver too much.
You're moving the goal posts now. Your original claim, which you later backed up in Post #47, was that he's doing it consistently, calling it an "issue". Every quarterback makes a bad read at times. This is no different with Brady. I would agree if you had said that. But to call it an "issue" and then try to back up your stance with the amount of targets that Edelman has gotten, is a little absurd. Again, Brady throws to Edelman because he gets open more quickly than most other receivers in the NFL. He loves the open man and, if Edelman is open when he looks, that's where the ball is going. If Edelman is doubled and Mitchell/Hogan/White/Bennett are open, the ball will go there as you have seen with the pics and the link I provided you.
In the Ravens game, Edelman was targeted 15 times, more than White, Mitchell, Bennett, Lewis and Blount combined. Passes to Edelman were completed less than half the time, while the rest of the team had 3 incompletions combined. At that rate of targeting, Edelman would obliterate the record for most targets in a season. Edelman is 30 and still not 100% from his surgery. He is an important part of the Patriots' chances and for that reason alone shouldn't be targeted as much as he has.
And, again, those targets are mixture of Edelman being open quickly, the way the defense is defending him and other receivers, and the game plan. But that's why he's getting the ball to Edelman. Going forward, those targets could, and likely will, decrease depending on the same factors. Brady isn't simply "locking onto" Edelman just to do it. There's a good reason why the ball is going there. This has been shown to you throughout the thread.
I'm sure we could produce several pictures of completions to other receivers (the Bennett TD comes to mind) where they weren't wide open, but Brady made the throw and completion. Would you look at those pictures and say, "nah, go to Edelman again." You seem to want to justify every pass to Edelman as it is. Maybe Edelman's targets should be doubled. Let's murder him.
Actually, for Brady, Bennett is open. He was single covered and had a step on the defender. The result was that the ball went to him and he got 7. And I haven't done anything of the sort. Saying so is essentially just you constructing another straw man.
It may be, as @Tony2046 suggests, that the excessive targeting is intentional, to lay groundwork for later. Perhaps. But even if that's the rationale, the lack of efficiency for those drives and the wear and tear on Edelman being targeted a historic number of times, is likely not worth it.
What lack of efficiency are you referring to? The Pats put up 30 on the best defense in the league.
I'm sure you will respond by saying "I have been proven correct. Also, I am seven feet tall." or some such nonsense, but I'm done.
That's fine. Again, if you have evidence that can somehow prove your point then I'm welcome to it. I don't see anything posted in this thread that corroborates that. By the way, in the time it took you to write out this and other replies to me, you could have posted the evidence that I requested earlier. And, finally, you should realize that you're debating with someone that, in the ten years that I've been here, has had zero issue in admitting I'm wrong. I come to this forum welcoming changes in perspective. If you can provide me with said evidence, I wouldn't have any issue whatsoever admitting that I was incorrect. I just don't see it.












