More tampering?

[IllegalContact]

Now the Bills too?

Jets, Bills to pursue Darrelle Revis | espn

Both teams should be penalized for interfering with a team's ability to keep one of it's own players.......it's tampering plain and simple.

The Jets are expected to pursue Revis to see if they can bring him back to New York, sources told ESPN. The Jets have already been preparing how to best make their run at Revis.

As if that weren't intriguing enough, former Jets head coach Rex Ryan -- still disappointed his former team didn't bring Revis back last year when it had the chance -- also wants to try to bring the Pro Bowl cornerback to the Bills, sources told ESPN.​

 

[BradyManny]

Trying to poach the best defender in the league is insignificant next to [actually not] tampering with a football. Move along, NFL, nothing to see here.

 

[JoeSixPat]

Trying to poach the best defender in the league is insignificant next to [actually not] tampering with a football. Move along, NFL, nothing to see here.

Who says there was no tampering? Reports suggest the only significantly under-inflated ball was the one in the Colt's possession. And we know from all the media experiments that the Colts only needed a few seconds to tamper with the ball.

I want to know exactly where that ball was while in the Colts possession at all times and I want the entire team interviewed.

But as to the additional tampering charges (thanks Wrecks!) I'm licking my chops over what we'll do with the compensatory picks we'll receive.

I say we trade them for established players a la Welker or a 4th rounder for the next Moss... or perhaps package them for a re-worked Fitzgerald contract

 

[memento]

Woody Johnson might bring tampering charges down on the Jets. An ESPN Bills reporter doesn't qualify under the (questionable) tampering rules as it stands, unless it's proven there was some sort of direct contact with Revis from a Bills official or a Bills official states public interest in bringing Revis to the team.

 

[Gumby]

Woody Johnson might bring tampering charges down on the Jets. An ESPN Bills reporter doesn't qualify under the (questionable) tampering rules as it stands, unless it's proven there was some sort of direct contact with Revis from a Bills official or a Bills official states public interest in bringing Revis to the team.

When you don't know what you are talking about, you should avoid posting. The last tampering thread had plenty of quotes of the tampering rule and one of the specific examples in the rule book was comments made to the media..... Ipso facto DIRECT CONTACT is NOT REQUIRED to prove tampering..

 

[convertedpatsfan]

We should leak that we would be interested in Marshawn Lynch if he became a free agent. He's in the last year of his contract, and most Seahawks insiders didn't expect him to return in 2015.

If we were to leak to Schefter that we'd love for him to be Corey Dillon 2.0 to help support an aging Brady, Goodell and an army of lawyers would be at Foxborough within an hour. Steve Young and Marshall Faulk would simultaneously orgasm on TV while screaming about it being cheating and ruining the integrity of the game and Kurt Warner would tell us how the leak for Lynch cost him another Super Bowl trophy.

But if it happens to the Patriots, nothing. And this leak through Schefter is actually peanuts compared to what Woody actually did. I mean, that would be the textbook definition of tampering except nobody would believe anyone could be that ****ing stupid to do that...except for a Jet. It'd be like a murderer confessing when someone asked him for the time. Just an absolute ****ing embarrassment of the human race...typical Jet.

 

[BradyManny]

Who says there was no tampering? Reports suggest the only significantly under-inflated ball was the one in the Colt's possession. And we know from all the media experiments that the Colts only needed a few seconds to tamper with the ball.

I want to know exactly where that ball was while in the Colts possession at all times and I want the entire team interviewed.

If the Colts stuck a gauge in the football, it would've dropped .25 psi. Obviously, they did in order to see it was under inflated. That ball was in play, wet & cold, and likely subject to the full 1.8 psi drop that HeadSmart predicts. Combined with them screwing around with gauging it on the sideline at least once, it is no surprise that ball was 2 psi under.

 

[PatsWickedPissah]

Gauged by the Dolts at least once, possibly several times, even w/o malicious intent, just cluelessness.
Then the refs gauged it to verify what the Dolts claimed.
You see where I'm going...
Sorta Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle applied to psi of a football

 

[RobertWeathers]

The NFL investigation team is busier than the IRS in April.

With that said, because this has a potential impact on draft picks, this should be up there in priorities. It also shouldn't take a lot of effort as Woody gave them all they need.