- Joined
- Apr 24, 2015
- Messages
- 17,539
- Reaction score
- 41,067
Hi there. I am the author of this piece. Thanks to the OP and for everyone's insights. Especially this one about the OTL piece. I wanted to include it, I really did. If fact I also couldn't fit in stuff about ESPN cancelling a show due to pressure from the NFL. And of course, there were many instances on bias on the deflategate issue: the "correction" about the walkthrough"; them re-writing Reiss's article that was critical of the OTL piece and other such things.
Truth is my editors let me go about 700 words longer than they prefer (3200 words, to the typical max of 2,500). There is literally so much evidence on ESPN's bias toward the league that it is hard to fit it in an article, even of that length. Also I wrote and submitted the first draft just as that 10,000 word OTL piece came out, so I could only briefly address it (when ESPN contacted me they directed me to that article as evidence that they can be critical of the NFL, which I had to respond to).
So, yeah, unfortunately I had to leave out some compelling examples. I also wanted to make sure I didn't focus almost entirely on Patriots stuff because I am writing for a national audience (and not a sports-fan audience at that), so I wanted to try and document other examples. Obviously my byline makes it obvious I am from Boston, so I wanted to make an argument that was broader than the Patriots stuff -- the biased coverage of deflategate is really just one example of many in which ESPN is compromised when it covers the NFL.
I will say that for some of the stuff I couldn't write about I tried to include them in some of the links.
Anyway, thanks for reading, posting and for your response. You are right that OTL situation would have helped to tell this story. I wish I had found a way to squeeze it in there.
Best,
Michael
Is this the real Michael or a Bills fan trying to pay us back for the troll job they fell for last week?












