amfootball
From Chapel Hill to Title Town
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2019
- Messages
- 6,759
- Reaction score
- 8,510
He was a tremendous pick up by San Fran.Agreeing on McCaffery. He's at another level, and that stresses defenses.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He was a tremendous pick up by San Fran.Agreeing on McCaffery. He's at another level, and that stresses defenses.
If you want to that route, Rhamandre Stevenson also has a losing record at RB.W/L record is also a QB stat.
RBs do not carry a W-L record. QBs do as well as baseball pitchers and hockey goalies. You know why? Because their play affects the outcomes of games the most.If you want to that route, Rhamandre Stevenson also has a losing record at RB.
See how that works?
They play on the same team. They lost the same games.RBs do not carry a W-L record. QBs do as well as baseball pitchers and hockey goalies. You know why? Because their play affects the outcomes of games the most.
You are missing the point entirely. QBs carry W-L record as a stat. No other player does because the QB affects the outcome of the games the most.They play on the same team. They lost the same games.
OK, if you consider that a reasonable sum why did you call it a "nightmare scenario"?
I don't think the QB win-loss record as the NFL tracks it means all that much at least compared to other sports.RBs do not carry a W-L record. QBs do as well as baseball pitchers and hockey goalies. You know why? Because their play affects the outcomes of games the most.
How many game winning drives ended like week 1 this year where a WR got a pass they should catch and couldn't pull it in or like the Bills game last year where they got in the redzone and an RB made a stupid play and fumbled? The other players matter with the "clutch gene". Tom Brady wasn't going to make those plays go different. In fact, we know Tom Brady just packed up and left when he saw what he was working with. So idk why a year 3 QB with 3 different OC's and one of the worst offensive casts in the NFL is going to be clutch.
They do but doesn't mean you treat their play in vacuum. Sum of parts needs to be positive at least neutral on offensive side. We are in negative territory there with offensive line and receivers.You are missing the point entirely. QBs carry W-L record as a stat. No other player does because the QB affects the outcome of the games the most.
RBs do not carry a W-L record. QBs do as well as baseball pitchers and hockey goalies. You know why? Because their play affects the outcomes of games the most.
33 games is a large sample size. Still, I do want to see the rest of this season play out but 0-2 out of the gate is not a good start ...I don't think the QB win-loss record as the NFL tracks it means all that much at least compared to other sports.
The NFL credits the QB with a win or loss if he starts the game no matter how long he stays in the game. That's how Brady cinched his losing season last year, he started against Atlanta and had the lead, and the Bucs lost the lead after he left the game. Brady started so he took the "loss" in that one which was totally undeserved. Brady also officially "lost" Super Bowl 52 by NFL recordkeeping and I don't think anyone other than you-know-who on this board lol blames him for that for obvious reasons. Jim Kelly put his Bills team in a 28-3 hole in the famous Bills Oilers comeback game. He left the game because of injury and Reich led the Bills to the comeback. But Kelly was credited with the "win". So that system seems really flawed to me.
Also I would argue that stat means a lot more for hockey goalies and baseball pitchers. They can guarantee their team cannot lose a game by saving every shot and striking out every batter. Their teammates don't have to do a thing to make that happen. QB's can't do that. They need receivers to catch passes, etc. It really is the ultimate team game.
I could care less about completion percentage ... win the game.PFF: through the first two games the Patriots OL is ranked 27th in pass blocking and dead last in run blocking. Despite no running game and poor protection, Mac Jones has a 69-percent completion percentage on the league's most pass attempts for the sixth-most yards among all quarterbacks. If that isn't rising to the occasion under duress, I don't know what is.
I could care less about completion percentage ... win the game.
The problem Tune, is the arm strength looks Chad Pennington noodle arm-like.PFF: through the first two games the Patriots OL is ranked 27th in pass blocking and dead last in run blocking. Despite no running game and poor protection, Mac Jones has a 69-percent completion percentage on the league's most pass attempts for the sixth-most yards among all quarterbacks. If that isn't rising to the occasion under duress, I don't know what is.
About the win loss record thing for QBs. Many of the people here who are trashing Mac for his win loss record and saying it is everything for determining how good a QB is are the same people who wanted the Pats to trade for DeShaun Watson and even give up multiple first round picks for him even though his record at that point was 28-27.
That's why the completion percentage is high when the ball is only traveling 5 yards.Worst QB stat and has no correlation to points or wins. This is the main reason the traditional passer rating formula is warped. It’s already covered (better) in yards/attempt. Mac has 69% completion and 5.4 ypa. That is one of the more extreme splits I’ve seen.
Definitely not ideal.33 games is a large sample size. Still, I do want to see the rest of this season play out but 0-2 out of the gate is not a good start ...
Specifically which of the “Many of the people here trashing Mac” posters here wanted the Patriots to trade multiple first round picks for Deshaun Watson?
Sounds like another confabulation.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










