- Joined
- Jun 17, 2000
- Messages
- 31,263
- Reaction score
- 47,882
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Or Mac isn't as good as he could/should be ... which I'm sure is also rolling some eyes.Sooooo, Patricia isn't any worse than Josh if Mac has improved.
I can't believe I typed the words, "Mac has improved".
As usual in life, it's most likely a little of both.Or Mac isn't as good as he could/should be ... which I'm sure is also rolling some eyes.
I am too lazy to go back and look at the opponents of the 5 game stretch last year. But this 5 game stretch has included terrible D's like the Cards, Raiders, and Vikes. That might account for the improvement too.
Ian, you should pick another hill to die on.
Indy and Ten were good D's last year. Atlanta, not so much. It's tough to even use the first Buffalo game because all Mac did was hand the ball off.
No worries, here they are.
You're arguments supporting Mac are now contradicting themselves. He's worse because he has a terrible coach and OL but he's statistically better? I realize the argument in this thread is incredibly weak as it's not apples-to-apples due to a variety of factors, but maybe slow down on the grasping at straws defense of Mac? Sure, we are all entitled to express our opinions but this new thread supporting Mac each day is getting ridiculous.I've seen your other posts and I don't get your issue. I get you want Mac gone, and my argument - which you ignored - is we're stuck right now having to make the best of what we have because other than Zappe, who will potentially be a factor in 2023, we don't have another guy right now.
That's the hill myself - and all the "Mac apologists" are on until this QB situation works itself out, and that one I'm "willing to die on." Until there's an alternative, we need the guy(s) they have to play well. Or we need to have actual discussions about who they should replace him with. Saying "he sucks" makes for unproductive threads, and we've certainly had plenty of those as of late.
I posted the numbers after noticing the discrepancy. Do with them what you will.You're arguments supporting Mac are now contradicting themselves. He's worse because he has a terrible coach and OL but he's statistically better? I realize the argument in this thread is incredibly weak as it's not apples-to-apples due to a variety of factors, but maybe slow down on the grasping at straws defense of Mac? Sure, we are all entitled to express our opinions but this new thread supporting Mac each day is getting ridiculous.
Just ran these. He's actually a little better than he was last season. Not fantastic, but fewer turnovers:
That game isn't in the above total - it's the same 5-game span they're currently in.Mac was not good last season after week 12. He played well in one game, the 50-10 blowout of Jacksonville (which was their 8th loss in a row). Take out that one game and to end the season Mac was 1-4 with 5 TDs and 7 INTs. I think people forget (or overlook) that Mac faded considerably last season after playing well during their 7-game winning streak. This season I don't think there's been a stretch of games where he's looked good.
Just ran these. He's actually a little better than he was last season. Not fantastic, but fewer turnovers:
And scratch the other comment I just deleted. I was looking up second-half totals earlier and forgot the box was still checked. #failMac was not good last season after week 12. He played well in one game, the 50-10 blowout of Jacksonville (which was their 8th loss in a row). Take out that one game and to end the season Mac was 1-4 with 5 TDs and 7 INTs. I think people forget (or overlook) that Mac faded considerably last season after playing well during their 7-game winning streak. This season I don't think there's been a stretch of games where he's looked good.
So the windstorm game in BUF are skewing last season's numbers. If you look at the attempts and yards and add 30 & 215 or so they would be closer. Who knows on the TD/INT ones.
No worries, here they are.
The Pats are not stuck right now.I've seen your other posts and I don't get your issue. I get you want Mac gone, and my argument - which you ignored - is we're stuck right now having to make the best of what we have because other than Zappe, who will potentially be a factor in 2023, we don't have another guy right now.
| 27 | 4K |
| 13 | 693 |
| 207 | 14K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 14 - April 29 (Through 26yrs)











