- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 55,479
- Reaction score
- 26,490
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Appreciate that! He doesn’t know I posted this, but I know he’s proud of me regardless.Your dad would be proud of you right now. Good boy.
Everything you said about his reputation was true the minute the story broke.I don't care whether legally he gets off on a technicality if the videos aren't admissable. The dude was seen multiple times going to this parlor and almost all of us would say it was for happy endings. The longer this drags for him it won't help. He's already lost in the public perception. Also he's a total hypocrite given how he folded on the deflategate witch hunt.
.
.
The media sensationalized it once that list contained a famous person’s name. Newsflash: You’re not allowed to prosecute people in secret. Wtf are they supposed to have done??
Moreover, if they'll do this to a billionaire, how often do they do that to the average Joe (or in this case, the average John?)Everything you said about his reputation was true the minute the story broke.
However these cops needlessly filmed him naked in a parlor without minimization, publicized his name specifically, and tried to tie it to the much worse crime of sex trafficking. Yeah if I was him I’d break their case too and hold a win over my head
A famous man was busted with a prostitute. There is literally no way to stop the media from sensationalizing it.The police aided and abetted this whole thing.. their need to sensationalize all of this is greater than the need to pursue justice.
What are you even talking about here??FYI evidence is withheld for many rich and famous Americans, and often it is justified as this is what happens to rich and wealthy men.. a world rife with NDA's and justification.
LMAO. Needlessly? So the issue is 'filmed' not 'naked'? Robert Kraft is a POS. He engaged in illegal and immoral activities and got caught. Whether or not he was able to buy his way out of a conviction, he is guilty. The NationalFelonsLeague will likely be OK with his behavior. Fans should not. I am not.Everything you said about his reputation was true the minute the story broke.
However these cops needlessly filmed him naked in a parlor without minimization, publicized his name specifically, and tried to tie it to the much worse crime of sex trafficking. Yeah if I was him I’d break their case too and hold a win over my head
Nice to see you find sex between consenting adults immoral. I feel sorry for your poor wife.LMAO. Needlessly? So the issue is 'filmed' not 'naked'? Robert Kraft is a POS. He engaged in illegal and immoral activities and got caught. Whether or not he was able to buy his way out of a conviction, he is guilty. The NationalFelonsLeague will likely be OK with his behavior. Fans should not. I am not.
Yes needlessly. If you watched any of the oral arguments you would know that they charged people without needing video evidence. However now the police have a bunch of smut videos that they are forced to send out in discovery of random women getting naked and having a regular massage. This is particularly an issue when the main contention of the case was a money transfer which didn’t even happen in the massage room.LMAO. Needlessly? So the issue is 'filmed' not 'naked'? Robert Kraft is a POS. He engaged in illegal and immoral activities and got caught. Whether or not he was able to buy his way out of a conviction, he is guilty. The NationalFelonsLeague will likely be OK with his behavior. Fans should not. I am not.
That's news to me. The statement still stands on its own though.
Kinda doesn't. Since we're talking about abuse of police powers, a snarky comment about defunding the police is exactly the kind of rhetorical overreach that confuses issues and distracts from the fact that individual officers really need to be disciplined over what happened here. And possibly DA personnel as well.That's news to me. The statement still stands on its own though.
Kinda doesn't. Since we're talking about abuse of police powers, a snarky comment about defunding the police is exactly the kind of rhetorical overreach that confuses issues and distracts from the fact that individual officers really need to be disciplined over what happened here. And possibly DA personnel as well.
This is not a police problem. This is an idiots-with-badges problem. If you can't distinguish between the two you have no business commenting on police policy.
Your comment has the effect of basically running interference for a corrupt police department and I for one don't really appreciate it.
The solution is neither to defund the police nor to accept the status quo, which your initial post seemed to be implying. The solution is to take the badges away from whoever authorized this illegal surveillance, and whoever didn't refuse a clearly illegal order to carry out the surveillance.
Basically disciplining the police on a case by case basis with an eye towards insuring that the police live up to the ideals most of them believe in anyway. Not as flashy or exciting as making broad statements, but it has the benefit of being the only brand of police reform that has a prayer of working, so there's that.
Keep digging, you'll find China eventually.