NG Pats Fan
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2009
- Messages
- 6,420
- Reaction score
- 7,106
Bourne looks painfully average on tape. our offense needs an explosive athlete game changer, not another average guyOh, that's a good comparison. For all the talk about slow receivers, Amendola is the poster child of too slow, too small, too unathletic -- yet he had some of the best routes and most clutch catches I can remember in the last decade.
Amendola
Height: 5104
Weight: 183
40 Yard Dash (ET): 4.70 (pro day he ran 4.58)
40 Yard Dash (HH): 4.68
20 Yard (ET): 2.71
20 Yard (HH): 2.65
10 Yard (ET): 1.63
10 Yard (HH): 1.51
225 Lb. Bench Reps: 13
Vertical Jump: 27 1/2 (pro day he jumped 31 1/2)
Broad Jump: 08'07"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.25
3-Cone Drill: 6.81
Bourne
Height: 6012
Weight: 203
40 Yard Dash (ET): 4.68 (pro day he ran 4.55)
40 Yard Dash (HH): 4.65
20 Yard (ET): 2.71
20 Yard (HH): 2.56
10 Yard (ET): 1.61
10 Yard (HH): 1.59
225 Lb. Bench Reps: 09 (pro day 10 reps)
Vertical Jump: 34 (pro day he jumped 36)
Broad Jump: 10'04"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.21
3-Cone Drill: 6.73
First four years in the league:
View attachment 31617
View attachment 31618
Hmm . . . I think I'd rather have the second guy. Did more with considerably fewer targets. Obviously, numbers don't tell the full story, but Bourne looks really good on tape. Very quick and decisive, can separate, offers YAC, reliable target, etc.
if waddle falls to us, his talent level is impossible to pass up