- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 16,775
- Reaction score
- 18,867
If you read that story the resort had a no-photos policy.They were lounging in a public place in full view of anyone and everyone who happened to be present. There isn't a court in the country who would say they have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel pool.
That would establish an expectation of privacy
From the article:
“Ambiente Sedona explicitly limits photography ‘to times when other guests are not included’ in photographs and forbids ‘taking photos in the public spaces that invade other guests’ privacy.’ With those assurances, Ambiente Sedona guests should expect they aren’t being surreptitiously photographed. The photographs might even be evidence of a criminal act,” wrote McCann.
In the state of Arizona, it’s a crime to knowingly photograph another person when that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy.












