- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 43,469
- Reaction score
- 21,656
So your plan is to expect Neal to come back healthy so that you have the mighty interior of an oft-injured Neal, Koppen and Connolly, with Wendell and Ohrnberger as the mighty backups????
Thanks; I'll pass.
Thanks; I'll pass.
1. Brady is the franchise and Wilfork is the anchor to the defense. Those guys were indispensable.
2. Bodden was signed at a bargain rate and next year he'll play RCB across from McCourty.
3. Mankins held out for the same reasons he is playing out the rest of the season. The amount of $$$ he wanted and what the Pats were willing to offer was obviously wide enough that a contract didn't get done. He is playing to earn that accrued year for his shot at free agency.
4. I have heard reports that Mankins said some regrettable things about the Krafts in the heat of negotiations and that's the reason the Pats pulled their offer.
5. Mankins is a really good guard, but guards are replaceable. When Mankins went down Connolly stepped in and the Pats OL performed at the #1 level in the NFL according to CHFF's numbers (how accurate they are, who knows). In any case when Neal went down, that's when Mankins became absolutely necessary to have. Before that he was a luxury. Right now he is a necessity.
6. When Neal returns to healthy status, Mankins will be a luxury again. The Pats may well choose to draft another guard if Mankins is still looking for that ridiculous 8M+ per season number. Remember the divide between Branch's asking price and the Pats offer wasn't that big, but pride makes people do strange things. Branch was exiled to Seattle and he came back and hasn't come back much richer for the experience except that he now has a greater appreciation than ever what a great QB like Tom Brady can do for him.
7. What makes you believe that Mankins would accept 6.5M per when the offer taken off the table was rumored at 7M+ and laughed at by Mankins' agent?











