I heard this discussion on the Adam Jones show yesterday.
He made some valid points;
1. Brady will be traded before he declines
2. Pats kept JG for a reason (he's the future)
3. Manning and Montana were traded once their teams found their next guy
4. Pats can get value for Brady in 2018
I'm the first one to think "We can't ever trade Brady!" And I don't want to see him traded.
But the reality is he likely will be traded if Kraft and BB believe Jimmy G is that good.
When you look at the writing on the wall, it's hard not to come to that conclusion.
Nobody wants to see Brady traded, but how else do you explain passing on Clevelands offer for Garoppalo?
If reports are correct, why would the Patriots not trade there backup QB for the 12th overall pick at a minimum?
Garoppalo is going to get paid next year, by either the Patriots or someone else.
It makes no sense to pass on that type of compensation unless they plan on keeping Garoppalo past this season.
I can understand the logic that Brady is 40 & we need a compatant backup, but let's not forget Brady has played every game other than his suspension over the last 8 years.
Next years draft has 3 highly rated QB's in the draft, so this was the year that Garoppalo provided "value" in the trade market.
I don't see the Patriots franchising Garoppalo to be a backup, & I also don't see him signing with the Patriots to remain a backup.
If anyone has a better explanation, I am all ears.