SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Why was Thomas inactive instead of Meyers? Could BB looking to trade Thomas? As a side issue, Thomas has a cap hit of $2.9M.
And when 2 are injured, we will decide whether to have 3 or 4 active, depending on game plan.I'd keep all of them and let 1 sit out each week ... eventually 1 or 2 will be injured.
Bill makes a killing on the veterans market because he knows how to treat them.
Having DT sign back as a free agent only to then trade him to a team he won't have any choice over is very bad form.
Young guys, no problem - but he wouldn't do this to a respected, time served VET who played along with the roster juggling a week ago.
OK
I would think that Thomas and his agent would approve any move.
Agree he would treat Thomas right.
Now Myers has trade value. He made a tough catch on a good route. Whole bunch of film on him both in college and preseason. Long term cheap control. That is worth a bunch to a team who feels it's wide receivers are not that good. How about Oakland's 5th round (should be near the top) from Pittsburgh for him.
Agree he would treat Thomas right.
Now Myers has trade value. He made a tough catch on a good route. Whole bunch of film on him both in college and preseason. Long term cheap control. That is worth a bunch to a team who feels it's wide receivers are not that good. How about Oakland's 5th round (should be near the top) from Pittsburgh for him.
Why was Thomas inactive instead of Meyers? Could BB looking to trade Thomas? As a side issue, Thomas has a cap hit of $2.9M.
No they are not looking to trade him