- Joined
- Oct 3, 2011
- Messages
- 4,825
- Reaction score
- 6,716
and if they really want to let their referees take charge of games, as they should, they'll look at expanding game day rosters
expand rosters to 50......that would let the referees actually use the ejection concept to take greater control of games
as it is now, they are handcuffed.....the rosters are tight, and if they eject players it really puts teams at a major competitive disadvantage......this is why refs are reluctant to eject players - they've actually been told to tread lightly in this regard
open the rosters and this is less of an issue......players will know the option is on the table, and the moment things get chippy, coaches can be warned......ejections follow suit
referees need to be able to take charge......a legitimate option to remove players from the contest gives them the tools they need
expand rosters to 50......that would let the referees actually use the ejection concept to take greater control of games
as it is now, they are handcuffed.....the rosters are tight, and if they eject players it really puts teams at a major competitive disadvantage......this is why refs are reluctant to eject players - they've actually been told to tread lightly in this regard
open the rosters and this is less of an issue......players will know the option is on the table, and the moment things get chippy, coaches can be warned......ejections follow suit
referees need to be able to take charge......a legitimate option to remove players from the contest gives them the tools they need












