- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 16,928
- Reaction score
- 31,563
Immediately after the season, I felt getting a S early in the draft was an absolute necessity. Now.....not so much.
1. This is not a good safety class to begin with.
2. 3 of the 4 top prospects are more SS types, and what WE lack is a coverage safety with the instincts and speed to actually get to the sideline and help over the top on deep sideline routes.
3. McCourty's promising showing when he played FS in some sub packages make the immediate need a little less pressing
4. The Pats have the cap room and would take a lot of the risk out of improving the safety position by picking up a high end S from this year's FA class (Goldson, Griffith, Nelson). This of course, would make the need to draft a S early less urgent.
5. For those reasons, I would be against using one of the first 5 picks on a S. The only exception to this would be if we picked Trumaine Johnson who is an interesting CB pick (probably in the 2nd) who some think projects to a coverage S
1. This is not a good safety class to begin with.
2. 3 of the 4 top prospects are more SS types, and what WE lack is a coverage safety with the instincts and speed to actually get to the sideline and help over the top on deep sideline routes.
3. McCourty's promising showing when he played FS in some sub packages make the immediate need a little less pressing
4. The Pats have the cap room and would take a lot of the risk out of improving the safety position by picking up a high end S from this year's FA class (Goldson, Griffith, Nelson). This of course, would make the need to draft a S early less urgent.
5. For those reasons, I would be against using one of the first 5 picks on a S. The only exception to this would be if we picked Trumaine Johnson who is an interesting CB pick (probably in the 2nd) who some think projects to a coverage S











