jeffbiologist
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
- Messages
- 1,440
- Reaction score
- 14
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He started off as the top pick and has lost momentum and percieved value has dropped. How far can he drop in the draft and how high would you trade up to get him? If he gets to Dallas I'd say he's worth the move.
No! No! No! He is a pure 4-3 under tackle and does not possess the skill set to read and react from one of our DE positions.
Just say no!!!!!!!
There are other's pointing out the draft rumors about Suh a year ago and noting the parallels. I doubt he slides that far, if he does, I think NE is an excellent landing place where Nick would have Vince and Ty and Pepper and BB setting the tone, I think he'd develop just fine.
Again, those reports all started surfacing after the Combine, classic timing for disinformation. Neither of us are in a position to know the truth, all we can do is look back to TV broadcast and his stats, either of which I can live with.Maybe - but I think one consistent sign I can point to in our first round picks is their love of the game and work ethic. Look at guys like Maroney and Merriweather. BB's always said Maroney worked hard, and Merriweather is a film rat.
I think a substantial lack of work ethic/love of the game disqualifies one from being on the NE board.
What have you seen to make yourself believe he can't do it? He played 43 in most of the snaps at Auburn. This kid is so athletic and talented I don't think you could truly tell what he could do in a 34 alignment if they put him there. All i saw was some guy in a 43 wrecking defenses all last year in the SEC. And that included pelting double teams all along the way.
I think Dareus is the most ready product for our system but I'm not going to rule Fairley out because he couldn't play our defense due to the coaches picking their alignment. He is well worth the risk imo. If he falls and the Pats trade up for him I'd be overjoyed knowing we may of just got another steal on draft day. I'd be willing to bet BB is watching his status closely.
You have to ask yourself if Fairley can stand up an opposing OT on running plays. Read and control the B abd C gaps and disengage and wrap up the ball carrier the second the RB enters his gaps.
Or is Fairley a guy that thrived in college by being quickest off the ball and shooting gaps to cause major disruption in the opposing backfield.
What happens if Fairley shoots the B or C gap at the snap in our 3-4 defense, the RB adjusts and heads straight for the huge unmanned holes Fairley just created. One cutback and the RB is gone. The ILBs have been wiped out by the OG and OT since neither had to block Fairley.
Just say NO!
What happens if Fairley shoots the B or C gap at the snap in our 3-4 defense, the RB adjusts and heads straight for the huge unmanned holes Fairley just created. One cutback and the RB is gone. The ILBs have been wiped out by the OG and OT since neither had to block Fairley.
Just say NO!
Anyway, this is the usual annual interesting although impossible scenario that has no chance of happening.
I think its been said before but we are in sub packages well over 50% of the time with some 4-3 and different alignments? He looks athletic and disruptive, just what we need next to the man mountains