Did you even ready B6's post above. The Pats have drafted pretty well over the years. More importantly, they've drafted very effectively DESPITE constantly drafting in the mid 20's for most of the decade.
If you knew your history a bit better you will have known that that so called "reliable pass rusher" you are so desperate for, will likely never exist. That's not how BB schemes his defense. Are you ever aware that during our defense's so called glory years (2003-2007) the Pats had only ONE player ever get to double digit sacks (Varbel in 2007). This despite the fact that the Pats were usually in the top 5 in sacks each year.
Sack totals are up across the league because teams pass so much more, but you should know that when the Pats' defenses are historically good under BB, there is NO dominant rusher, but rather sacks are spread around.
Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about (again). All you care about are the WR's and sack artists. You think they solve all problems when historically the best WR's and sack artists usually aren't playing on the "elite teams". TEAMS win, not individuals. That's why 10 of the top 12 so called #1 WR's were watching football in January. I would think that you'd understand this small nugget.
You are a perfect example of the dangers of having a "little bit of knowledge", compounded by an ego that allows you think you are 100% correct in all your opinions while everyone else is an idiot for thinking differently.
Let me give a bit of friendly advice. Stop being so self assured. I know a lot more football than you do. But in my long involvement woth the game, what I'm constantly reminded of is how much i DON'T know. It might be humbling to consider it, but it will work wonders on your posts.