DropKickFlutie
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 9,574
- Reaction score
- 9,155
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Here's another thing. The Pats' PLan A was Amendola, and they were willing to pay this guy more than Welker.
Amendola's value, people were saying this was a $2-4M type of receiver. They splurged at $6M/year, probably more than others would have paid for.
I think BB didn't want Amendola's camp to disclose the signing because he wanted to ensure that he set the price so WW could get the most money possible in FA.
Disagree.
It was a petty, personal, non-typical Patriots move and it hurt Welker.
If it was disclosed publicly that a scrub like Amendola got $31 for 5 years after barely playing the 2 most recent seasons, Welker's price would have gone much higher.
Keeping that first deal quiet kept the market low for Welker. The Pats really played hardball with Welker
My thinking is that they still wanted Welker but at a cheap price. With the perception that Amendola was still in the market, other teams may not have been as desperate to give money to Welker. It also would have made Welker more money than they were offering.
They wanted Amendola and Welker (on the cheap only). They were ready to roll with both if Welker on the cheap. One can make the argument that Welker on the cheap means no Welker but at this point it doesn't matter.
So was Welker seeking 8 to 9 mill from the pats not 6? That wasn't clarified.
In the end Pats made their choice time to move on I say.
Disagree.
It was a petty, personal, non-typical Patriots move and it hurt Welker.
If it was disclosed publicly that a scrub like Amendola got $31 for 5 years after barely playing the 2 most recent seasons, Welker's price would have gone much higher.
Keeping that first deal quiet kept the market low for Welker. The Pats really played hardball with Welker
I disagree -- What Amendola signed for wouldn't have affected Welker. But if it was known that the Pats had moved on, it would've meant even less competition for Welker's services -- If Denver knew that the Pats were out of the running, they could've just offered 2/10
Disagree.
It was a petty, personal, non-typical Patriots move and it hurt Welker.
If it was disclosed publicly that a scrub like Amendola got $31 for 5 years after barely playing the 2 most recent seasons, Welker's price would have gone much higher.
Keeping that first deal quiet kept the market low for Welker. The Pats really played hardball with Welker
Disagree.
It was a petty, personal, non-typical Patriots move and it hurt Welker.
If it was disclosed publicly that a scrub like Amendola got $31 for 5 years after barely playing the 2 most recent seasons, Welker's price would have gone much higher.
Keeping that first deal quiet kept the market low for Welker. The Pats really played hardball with Welker
How does keeping the signing quiet hurt Welkers market>?
My bad. Trying to be sarcastic. However I do not think it was personal.
Once WW hit the open market he became just another FA and was treated accordingly. With that said, WW also treated the Pats just like another team.
It's not hard.
Amendola barely played the past 2 years. The 2 years prior to that he didn't do anything special, averaged 8 yards a catch. People on here were speculating he was worth $2M to $4 million a year.
It is unquestioned that Welker is a better player and worth more, at least in public sentiment.
If the information was leaked first that Amendola was worth $6M a year to the Pats, it would have RAISED Welker's value in the open market. Instead, that information was hidden and only released on Amendola's market value AFTER Welker signed that extremely high-value deal.
Welker was a lot more team friendly than Mankins was. Welker didn't hold out. He didn't publicly ****** and call out ownership. He signed his franchise tender and played, at risk, on a 1 year deal. He didn't get rewarded by the Pats for that, they didn't give him credit for that. They also tried to mess with him for zero reason the first few games.
This situation did not have to happen. It's bizarre. Smells like Denver 2010.
If welker was a better player he would have gotten paid more. end of discussion.
Welker had 3 offers 2/10 with incentives to get upto 16 from the pats, 2/12 from the bronos, and 2/15 from the titans.
Welkers market was set at between 5-7.5 million a year where some teams had 20-40 million in cap space free.
Welker put his ego on a pedestal and the nfl showed him he was not worth as much as he thought. Welker chose to walk away, and the patriots would have accepted him even after signing someone else when welker balked. This is the nfl and its a ******* team game, that money will go to other postitions and the patriots will be at the cap again this year like every year.
If you want to root for a team that breaks the bank every time a player wont pay for what the market value is, go root for the jets and their cluster**** of an organization. This is the Patriots.
This is all after welker declined a 3 year deal averaging 8 a year.
Not even true
He was reportedly offered 2 years 16 AFTER the end of his other deal, a 2yr extension
I get it, you think he got greedy and you also blindly support every move
| 11 | 2K |
| 13 | 536 |
| 12 | 3K |
| 11 | 508 |
| 7 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 29 - May 14 (Through 26yrs)











