Hey bud, if you think Matt Cassel is or ever has been, even an above average NFL QB then have it. Jimmy is on another planet and a few years will tell how laughable your position is.
With your ill advised follow up statements you've lost sight of what my original position was, so I'll rephrase. Jimmy G certainly has looked the part in the limited sample size, but I offer up Cassel as a cautionary tale of how New England with their coaching staff, good team, and winning culture can make quarterbacks look good.
You find my positions laughable and yet your position has been........
"Cassel has struggled with every part of his game."
and
"You need to rewatch those games. He has never had a great game."
Which are statements that are just so indisputably false, and yet apparently I have the laughable position. I mean, I would have thought even for those people with bad memories that they would have at least looked up a game log or something before making such a wrong definitive statement.
We all know Cassel turned out to be a bum, but that doesn't mean that he wasn't good when he was on the Pats. Again, I'm not sure why people want try so hard to make this be the case. He was traded for a 2nd round pick (and not as a salary dump), and there is a long thread from this forum over people debating keeping Cassel over Brady. (For the record, I never understood the Brady vs Cassel and still think it to be crazy, but the fact that the conversation even existed means something.)