-You are all over the place. Or you just can't follow along with rational and logical thoughts.
-Gaffney came into his own in the playoffs. 3 straight solid performances prove this. Gaffney didn't have much of a chance to be the "go to guy" for Brady during the regular season. He was signed in October. WEAK! He came into his own because the coverage was more focused on a WR that had actually done something (caldwell). Once Gaffney did do something, teams started to focus on him and he dissappeared. Your next point proves this.
-3 receptions for 37 yards and a TD is better than 4 catches for 46 yards and 2 dropped passes (probably both TDs) Speculation at it's best. Not to mention you just proved my point about Gaffney. BTW, did you know that in week 15 Gaffney dropped a sure TD catch down the sideline. In week 16, Gaffney had a 22 yard reception overturned because he was bobbling it as he stepped out of bounds. In week 18, Gaffney dropped a 41 yard TD. These catches were easier than the one that Caldwell pulled in during the SD game and he dropped them. Being sigined in the beginning of Oct. has absolutely nothing to do with this.
Caldwell had a good game. Great, lets vote him into the hall of fame.
Excellent job picking out a game that GAFFNEY DIDN'T EVEN START IN!:singing: So you concede to the fact that Gaffney isn't even good enough to start against the Lions, good job! :singing:
-Gaffney had a game changing play against Indy. Game would have probably been over if he didn't make that ridiculous TD catch to bail out Reche. First of all this makes no sense what-so-ever and again, speculation. BTW, a "game changing play" is only considered as such if the team actually WINS the game. So that wasn't a game changing play, just a helluva catch. Good try though. Again, pick out a game changing play please.
-Reche Caught a ball that every receiver in the league should catch. (half of which would have stayed in bounds and scored a td) Catching a ball over your shoulder with a defender on your back IS HARDLY a catch every receiver should make. You are so biased AGAINST Caldwell that you can't even give the man his due when he's earned it. Staying in bounds is irrelevant (again you show your bias against Caldwell here), that play is the definition of a game changing play and you know it or you should know it. If you don't then please stop making comments about things you don't understand.
-Not sure what the hell this means... It means that in no time during Gaffney's career did he produce like Caldwell did last year for the Pats. What makes you think that he will be able to put up career numbers with the Pats? This is something that Caldwell has already accomplished. He is proven and Gaffney isn't.