- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 21,770
- Reaction score
- 24,243
As you've mentioned here and before, we can only compare players from their eras, which is true. And with all the rule changes and expansion, records are almost meaningless now.One aspect of athletic competition is pressure.
Stakes is just the beginning. It was 'easier' back in the day to have character and determination because unless you were named Bill or Wilt you were working in the summer time to pay your family's bills.
Whatever outside pressures there are today, players can't claim they're not being paid handsomely.
You still see star studded teams today even in the league's watered-down expanded world.
All the leagues have legislated away much of the violence and hence toughness.
The statistics just don't compare appropriately between eras.
I seem to remember Stanley Morgan having a YPC that was over 20 but dropped just under at the end of his career. Was that the standard back then (I don't think it was) and how would that look now? I'm going to have to take a closer look.












