upstater1
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 30,287
- Reaction score
- 22,544
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.PonyExpress said:I happen to agree with Brady that Branch is a #1 and will prove it over the next 5 years. I do not blame Branch for holding out, and applaud Brady for sticking up for him. Maybe Brady will renegotiate to meet the difference between the two sides. That would be real leadership.
5 Rings for Brady!! said:dhamz:
Brady was in this position himself a couple years ago, with his contract negotiations dragging out for a long time.
dhamz said:Obviously Silver got a one on one interview with Brady - likely set up by Brady specifically to talk about Branch.
upstater1 said:I don't understand this attitude one bit.
Brady is already severely underpaid at $10 million per. Branch, at the level he wants to get paid at ($7 million?) will be severely overpaid. If you want the best player on your team to take a $1 million pay cut to elevate another player that's not even a third as valuable as he is to within 20% of Brady's salary, you have just severely whacked your entire pay structure.
Brady already took less to win Super Bowl rings. What the heck is Branch's problem? The Patriots offered him market rate, what he's worth.
Would any of you trade Brady for two Deion Branch's? Then please tell me why Branch is worth $3 million less than Brady.
PonyExpress said:I happen to agree with Brady that Branch is a #1 and will prove it over the next 5 years. I do not blame Branch for holding out, and applaud Brady for sticking up for him. Maybe Brady will renegotiate to meet the difference between the two sides. That would be real leadership.
patsox23 said:Read and learn: Brady did not take a hometown discount. He is NOT underpaid. This is a myth. An understandable one, but a myth. He's paid competitively for his position. It was a good deal for BOTH sides.
patsox23 said:Read and learn: Brady did not take a hometown discount. He is NOT underpaid. This is a myth. An understandable one, but a myth. He's paid competitively for his position. It was a good deal for BOTH sides.
mgcolby said:Well, he has had 4 years to prove it. A player only signs one contract in his career that is based on unproven potential and that is their rookie contract. After that they sign a contract valued on their proven results mixed with the idea that he will either sustain that level of production or increase it over the length of that contract.
They offered him a salary that is commensurate with what he brings to the team and he ended the negotiations. That is outright stupid!
flutie2phelan said:Wow, some story!
We ponder all the starters on PUP ... and had nightmares over Brady's absence for 3 sessions.
Could these gents be pulling a sick-out, a coordinated "work action"?
Seems far-fetched ... but so does the whole Branch story.
.[/I]
PonyExpress said:and your opinion means what to me? You must be a professor of logic, genius.
kptmorgan04 said:you are joking.... right???
| 23 | 868 |
| 19 | 489 |
| 6 | 642 |
| 14 | 648 |
| 10 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 8 - April 23 (Through 26yrs)











