I read through the filing again. I tried to go into this time with the mindset that Brown did it and then work my way out to see if I could make a compelling argument to...myself (anyone have anything for me to do?)
The biggest problem to me is the story leading up to the night she claims she was raped. It just doesn’t make sense.
If she did in fact have a document signed by Brown acknowledging a professional relationship, it just seems so incredibly strange that she would accept an invitation to a social gathering with Brown, drive him home, and then go inside to use the bathroom. What kind of impaired judgment would she have to use, and how would her long-term boyfriend really be okay with this, considering she had already expressed concerns about Brown’s behavior?
Another point is that if Brown did sign that document about their relationship going forward, it is also incredibly poor judgment if he invited her out. How can you not see this coming from a hundred miles away?
If she is telling the truth, or at least this is her perspective, I get the sense that she wasn’t entirely sure what she wanted with Brown, and whether or not she she wanted a sexual relationship with him. That this relationship was a gray area with mixed signals is the only thing that can plausibly explain their meetup (with the evidence available now, which isn’t much) after a legal document was exchanged to clarify their relationship.