PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

A Look at Denver's Bread and Butter Option- The Midline Read


Status
Not open for further replies.

jays52

PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
4,177
Reaction score
1,854
I caught Patriots All Access tonight and payed specific attention to the Belichick Breakdown segment. The main focus of it was the singleback option, as that is the meat of their option game. While they will run zone read off of it, it seems that the majority of it is the midline option, as Tebow is best between the tackles. They build multiple back sets off of motion, and in turn can present a more traditional pitch option look. However the fact that they are utilizing motion to build off of the singleback look tells me that the basis of their option game is the midline. So, being the football nerd that I am I furiously scoured the interwebs for Broncos highlights. What I found was overwhelming evidence of a strong reliance upon the midline option as the foundation of the Denver run game. Let's take a look at what it is.


The midline read got it's beginnings as an adjustment play off of the zone read option. The zone read option is keyed off of the backside end. In traditional zone plays where no one accounts for the backside end, the play is often blown up in the backfield by that end getting skinny along the line in the backfield. This end is forced to sellout to defend the zone, so offenses figured out that by having the quarterback read that player they could gash the defense regardless of how the backside end should play. If he stays home, handoff to a traditional zone play. Should the end crash, QB keeps and skirts the now poorly positioned backside end man on scrimmage (EMOS). As this play began to become a standard defenses adapted. They realized that they could effectively bait the QB keep by stunting the end and tackle. They would crash the end, baiting the keep, and loop the tackle into the area vacated by the end. This is also done by crashing the end and replacing him with the backside linebacker. So, like any other chess game, another move was made and the midline read option was born.

In the midline read, the QB is reading the playside defensive tackle and the back is aiming for the outside hip of the center. The playside guard and tackle block the playside backer and EMOS, respectively. This leaves the defensive tackle unblocked with a decision to make, and defensive linemen aren't the best decision makers on earth. Should the DT sellout towards the center, the QB keeps and hits the vacated area and follows a lead block from the playside TE or slotback. Should the DT stay home, the QB gives to the back straight ahead. Simple enough, right? Well, here's where Denver begins to build the fundamentals of their option game.

There's a lot of ways to design an offense around the midline read as it's balance enables a lot of shifting and pulling. At first glance of the first matchp, I thought that the power-o and other pulling based runs were the meat of the offense. Turns out, my lying eyes stayed true to their nature. What I first thought was the power-o was in fact the midline trap. Highschool and college offenses run the midline trap as a derivation of their midline read, and Denver has assimilated this into their offense. This is a "wider" option that attacks both sides of the defense. The read is still the defensive tackle, but the backside of the play looks a lot different. Let's saying that the read tackle is on the right side of the line. The right guard (backside, or off guard hence the power-o) pulls to the left, leaving the defensive tackle unblocked...we'll get to that later, though. The right guard is now aiming for the hip of the left tackle. The center will get upfield to seal the linebacker following the pulling guard. The left tackle will slip past the end, and reach the outside linebacker. The guard traps the end, the left tackle is now on the linebacker, and if executed the back just has to beat the safety for 6. Ah but what about that read tackle we mentioned earlier? As the QB hits the mesh point (option speak for handoff decision as the ball is placed into the sternum of the back) he reads the defensive tackle. If the defensive tackle is coming, the QB will keep and skirt the crashing tackle to the right side of the line. Should the tackle stay home, the ball is given to the back to run off of his pulling guard. This play is beautiful in it's lethality because it exploits the read of the linebacker and the pulling guard. It plays the numbers game on the hypothetical right side of the line that the option is based off of.

Once this midline concept is established, the team can run power-o's, they can utilize wham blocking to kickout the conditioned tackle and run at him, they can motion in a receiver and run the veer off of this. They can build in their pitch options, hell, they even were running the freaking PISTOL :eek: in a few clips I saw. They can PA really well off of this look because of the numbers game it forces, and the advantageous throwing position the QB is in. In fact, the skinny post that beat Pittsburgh in OT was a playaction midline trap that drew the safety to overcommit to the handoff trap play. The versatility afforded by this one concept enables Denver to punch and counterpunch off of one simple personnel group and fundamental concept. It keeps the reads simple and predictable for Tebow, and presents a myriad of potential plays off of one look for the defense. It's very interesting to see a professional offense executing these concepts at such a high level. After the research, it is very simple to me what the Patriots gameplan is going to be. They are going to gameplan to shutdown the midline concept. If they can accomplish this, the engine that drives the Denver offense will stall. Cool.
 
The versatility afforded by this one concept enables Denver to punch and counterpunch off of one simple personnel group and fundamental concept. It keeps the reads simple and predictable for Tebow, and presents a myriad of potential plays off of one look for the defense. It's very interesting to see a professional offense executing these concepts at such a high level. After the research, it is very simple to me what the Patriots gameplan is going to be. They are going to gameplan to shutdown the midline concept. If they can accomplish this, the engine that drives the Denver offense will stall. Cool.

Thanks so much for that breakdown!


A couple questions. First, do you realistically see the Pats being able to shutdown the midline concept given their personnel and Denver's personnel (and why or why not)? If not then I would presume that means that the Pats offense will likely need to score on almost every possession, correct?

Also, based on those Broncos highlights that you watched if the Pats do have success shutting down the midline concept does Denver have a viable Plan B, or does that most likely mean the game is over and the Pats should win easily?


thanks again ...
 
Honor your gaps. If we do that much, we should be good.
 
A couple questions. First, do you realistically see the Pats being able to shutdown the midline concept given their personnel and Denver's personnel (and why or why not)? If not then I would presume that means that the Pats offense will likely need to score on almost every possession, correct?

Also, based on those Broncos highlights that you watched if the Pats do have success shutting down the midline concept does Denver have a viable Plan B, or does that most likely mean the game is over and the Pats should win easily?

I absolutely do see them shutting down the midline concept. I see this for a few reasons. The first of which is simply scheme. The 34 is a great defense against the mindline concept primarily because of spacing. The read becomes the end and in a 5-technique will almost universally dictate a give read. The 34 alignment also ties into my second reason for seeing a dominant defensive performance, good linebackers. A major key in defending any option is slow-playing the read. By slow-playing a read, you get your second level help coming much quicker to defend the choice. Not only do capable linebackers play the run better, they also are very well coached here. I expect them to slow-play the option and get great support from Chung. The spacing of the 34 also makes most midline concepts much more slowly developing. As a disciplined defense that will maintain gap integrity, the Patriots greatly reduce the probability of time creating a crease. It will simply collapse around them.

I view the midline concept as the key to the offense, everybit as key as Faulk was to the Rams offense. The Broncos big plays come off of constraint plays that are setup by the strength of the midline game. While they may, and likely will make plays off of edge concepts and timely called passes, those cannot sustain drives. They are so restricted by the quarterback that they really can't seamlessly shift into a different look that will consistently beat you. It's not like a team that wins the ball well but can still adequately distribute the ball on the perimeter and seams to force honesty. The key will be winning on 1st and 2nd down. I view 3rd and 6 as a very difficult down and distance for that offense. If New England is able to force punts early in the game I see it as rapidly getting out of hand for Denver.
 
Protect the dive and hit the QB at all times on run snaps.
 
Harrison looked like a fool last game. Everyone on the defense needs to do their job. If your key is the QB, don't go after the ******* RB.
 
Wow! Awesome analysis.

If what you predict comes true, please allow me to buy you a drink and dinner. :)
 
So, like any other chess game, another move was made...

Thanks for this education! I assume Denver ran the midline option against NE last game, and NE successfully adjusted after the 1st Q. Curious to see what NE did to stop it, but now, what can Denver do to re-adjust to NE.
 
Patriots All Access - 1/13/2012

What does the producer of All Access have against Lyndsay Petruny? She was left out to dry with the lack of editing on her facetime segment. Wow.
 
WOW! Its important to understand what a good job Jay has done here. There are literally 300 page books that have been written to break down the various aspects of the option, so attempting any description in the limited space we have here here is very difficult

But this does this take me back to when I was coaching. It was in the mid 70's that the read option started to come into vogue. Prior to that it was the belly option where the "reads" were mostly pre-determined. Then the triple option and veer options started to become popular. The concept was simple. You could get "numbers" on a play by NOT blocking 2 players and creating an opening depending on what those player did or didn't do.

This concept was very tempting, especially for teams who might be physically mismatched. Its the reason why the service academies still run it because they rarely get 300+ lb offensive linemen, and since the triple option is bases on who you are NOT blocking, the disadvantage of smaller offensive linemen is mitigated. On paper, if executed correctly, it can't be stopped.. Fortunately the game is not decided "on paper", and the defense is not defenseless.

Where ANY option can be broken down is in a couple of areas. First, to be successful the QB has to make the correct read. So defenses have several techniques to make that as difficult as possible. There are things you do to try and bait the QB into making the read you want him to. The key to all these adjustments is disguise and change. You have keep the QB as unsure as possible and the longer you can keep him from making that ready the better it is for your defense

The 2nd weakness is in the 2 possible exchanges.(the hand off and pitch) There is an increased element of turnover risk in both those areas. It is the defense's job to do what it has to in order to maximize the risk. Since the purpose of this post is to increase your general awareness of option concepts and the defensive responses, I won't go into the detail of what those responses are, because it would just take too much time. ;)

But in a nutshell the major reason why the option will NEVER become a major aspect on any pro offense is that the major element of defending it is to make sure the QB is DRILLED on every play, whether he has the ball or not. Do this, and over the course of a game, the QB will start to make some faulty decisions. On the NFL level, even a QB as strong as Tebow will not be able to take the pounding over time to run a true option offense.....and Denver doesn't

An interesting aspect of the Denver option game is that they will rarely use a pitchman. Usually they do it just a couple of times a game. Just enough to force you to take practice time to defend it. Instead for Denver the "triple option" breaks down to dive, QB run, and rather than risk a pitch, they play action pass. That way they only need one back in the backfield and can create natural gaps by spreading the defense out.

If I were running this defense my "basic" option strategy would be to make the QB run the ball on every option play. I'd close down the dive as soon as possible and make the QB declare. The fast you make him make that decision, the quicker your defense can react to the ball. Tebow is a good runner, McGahee is a BETTER one. The second reason is it give my defense more opportunities to put hits on him. The more hits we put on him the less efficient he will become over the course of the ballgame

"Gap integrity" "ball discipline" "Do YOUR job" are the watchwords we'll hear all game, but what it boils down to is doing what you can to make the QB misread his keys and when he guesses right, mitigating the damage. The bottom line in the Steeler OT was, despite the fact it was a great call, run against the perfect defense, and had perfect execution, it STILL should have only been a 20 yd gain.

The simple weakness of the option is that it is harder to execute than a standard run offense. Every time you make them line up and run a play, the greater the chance is that there will be a breakdown. So if the team tackles well, maintains its "gap integrity", and creates a certain amount of confusion, Denver might gain YARDS, but few POINTS. Certainly not enough to match what will be happening on the other side.

Hope this helps add to what Jay has started
 
Denver might gain YARDS, but few POINTS.

but...but...by that metric, we have the WORST defense in the UNIVERSE! YARDS!

Seriously though patfanken and jays52, your posts are amazing, and keep me coming back to the site every day. Every time you guys post, I learn something about this game that I didn't know and for that I'm grateful!
 
Nice addition patfanken. Jay speaks on a completely different level than some of us understand. I guess I'll be the first to admit I have no idea what a 34 is for example along with some of the other more technical terms. Thanks for breaking it down in a easier to understand language. Great job guys. Maybe we can get some pictures in there next time?:D
 
Decent spot to get x's and o's in detail.....for those who want to delve deeper into the how's and why's....

Coach T's Football Spot

I think I'll just sit back with some popcorn and yell at missed tackles ( Ninkovich) and undefended WR's ( Brown/McCourty) :D

Hoping for a Patriot blowout so I don't have to up my BP meds...LOL
 
Last edited:
Feel like I just got schooled big time by Jay and Patsfanken. I have read both of your post in this thread multiple times. Great stuff.
 
WOW! Its important to understand what a good job Jay has done here. There are literally 300 page books that have been written to break down the various aspects of the option, so attempting any description in the limited space we have here here is very difficult

But this does this take me back to when I was coaching. It was in the mid 70's that the read option started to come into vogue. Prior to that it was the belly option where the "reads" were mostly pre-determined. Then the triple option and veer options started to become popular. The concept was simple. You could get "numbers" on a play by NOT blocking 2 players and creating an opening depending on what those player did or didn't do.

This concept was very tempting, especially for teams who might be physically mismatched. Its the reason why the service academies still run it because they rarely get 300+ lb offensive linemen, and since the triple option is bases on who you are NOT blocking, the disadvantage of smaller offensive linemen is mitigated. On paper, if executed correctly, it can't be stopped.. Fortunately the game is not decided "on paper", and the defense is not defenseless.

Where ANY option can be broken down is in a couple of areas. First, to be successful the QB has to make the correct read. So defenses have several techniques to make that as difficult as possible. There are things you do to try and bait the QB into making the read you want him to. The key to all these adjustments is disguise and change. You have keep the QB as unsure as possible and the longer you can keep him from making that ready the better it is for your defense

The 2nd weakness is in the 2 possible exchanges.(the hand off and pitch) There is an increased element of turnover risk in both those areas. It is the defense's job to do what it has to in order to maximize the risk. Since the purpose of this post is to increase your general awareness of option concepts and the defensive responses, I won't go into the detail of what those responses are, because it would just take too much time. ;)

But in a nutshell the major reason why the option will NEVER become a major aspect on any pro offense is that the major element of defending it is to make sure the QB is DRILLED on every play, whether he has the ball or not. Do this, and over the course of a game, the QB will start to make some faulty decisions. On the NFL level, even a QB as strong as Tebow will not be able to take the pounding over time to run a true option offense.....and Denver doesn't

An interesting aspect of the Denver option game is that they will rarely use a pitchman. Usually they do it just a couple of times a game. Just enough to force you to take practice time to defend it. Instead for Denver the "triple option" breaks down to dive, QB run, and rather than risk a pitch, they play action pass. That way they only need one back in the backfield and can create natural gaps by spreading the defense out.

If I were running this defense my "basic" option strategy would be to make the QB run the ball on every option play. I'd close down the dive as soon as possible and make the QB declare. The fast you make him make that decision, the quicker your defense can react to the ball. Tebow is a good runner, McGahee is a BETTER one. The second reason is it give my defense more opportunities to put hits on him. The more hits we put on him the less efficient he will become over the course of the ballgame

"Gap integrity" "ball discipline" "Do YOUR job" are the watchwords we'll hear all game, but what it boils down to is doing what you can to make the QB misread his keys and when he guesses right, mitigating the damage. The bottom line in the Steeler OT was, despite the fact it was a great call, run against the perfect defense, and had perfect execution, it STILL should have only been a 20 yd gain.

The simple weakness of the option is that it is harder to execute than a standard run offense. Every time you make them line up and run a play, the greater the chance is that there will be a breakdown. So if the team tackles well, maintains its "gap integrity", and creates a certain amount of confusion, Denver might gain YARDS, but few POINTS. Certainly not enough to match what will be happening on the other side.

Hope this helps add to what Jay has started

Fantastic post, Ken. I'd like to pick your brain sometime about the origins of the zone read and iterations of the EMOS swap used to defend it.

The bolded part is what I deem especially important in the context of this game. I think another major flaw of the Pitt gameplan is that they were in a big-play defense against an offense that is extremely difficult to sustain. I think something to look for from NE, other than the watch-words is forcing Denver to sustain a 14 play drive. It's bound to stall if forced to execute that many plays on each drive. The probability of failure on the option is just too high.

Again, great post.
 
Last edited:
Fantastic post, Ken. I'd like to pick your brain sometime about the origins of the zone read and iterations of the EMOS swap used to defend it.

The bolded part is what I deem especially important in the context of this game. I think another major flaw of the Pitt gameplan is that they were in a big-play defense against an offense that is extremely difficult to sustain. I think something to look for from NE, other than the watch-words is forcing Denver to sustain a 14 play drive. It's bound to stall if forced to execute that many plays on each drive. The probability of failure on the option is just too high.

Again, great post.
I think Denver knows the odds of running a sustained option offense isn't great. What I expect to happen is that the "Option play" is going to be used in a limited manner, perhaps just 10-15 times out of about 60 snaps. The biggest advantage the Denver option game gives it is the amount of time it takes out of the Pats defensive practice, and the indecision it causes during game time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Patriots News 4-28, Draft Notes On Every Draft Pick
MORSE: A Closer Look at the Patriots Undrafted Free Agents
Five Thoughts on the Patriots Draft Picks: Overall, Wolf Played it Safe
2024 Patriots Undrafted Free Agents – FULL LIST
MORSE: Thoughts on Patriots Day 3 Draft Results
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots Head Coach Jerod Mayo Post-Draft Press Conference
2024 Patriots Draft Picks – FULL LIST
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots CB Marcellas Dial’s Conference Call with the New England Media
So Far, Patriots Wolf Playing It Smart Through Five Rounds
Wolf, Patriots Target Chemistry After Adding WR Baker
Back
Top