- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 43,430
- Reaction score
- 21,618
Which of these are worth a roster position?
PUNT RETURNER
Last year, our PR was our #3 WR. Now, he is #5 WR, when we might keep only 4.
KICK RETURNER
This is a new thing for Belichick. Kick returns become less important and now we are ready to use a roster spot for a KR. To me, this only makes sense if they are saving Washington's running reps for the season. Washington's signing made a lot of sense when he was replacing Woodhead, not so much only as a KR.
FULLBACK/HBACK
Last year, Hooman was the 4th TE, who was called upon to be a FB/Hback. Now we will have 4 TE's without Hooman. Is FB/Hback worth a roster spot?
PUNT RETURNER
Last year, our PR was our #3 WR. Now, he is #5 WR, when we might keep only 4.
KICK RETURNER
This is a new thing for Belichick. Kick returns become less important and now we are ready to use a roster spot for a KR. To me, this only makes sense if they are saving Washington's running reps for the season. Washington's signing made a lot of sense when he was replacing Woodhead, not so much only as a KR.
FULLBACK/HBACK
Last year, Hooman was the 4th TE, who was called upon to be a FB/Hback. Now we will have 4 TE's without Hooman. Is FB/Hback worth a roster spot?
