I understand the difference, agree it's loose.
Generally, to earn a 1st round grade from someone like Miller (which I view as relatively meaningless) a prospect has to have 1st round tape, good measurable, expect to test well, be injury free and have no major character issues. Most 1st round prospects aren't that clean. Positional value also factors in.
Regarding some of the "near misses":
- Jordyn Tyson and Jermod McCoy check every box except for injury/medical.
- Makai Lemon and Aveion Terrell check every box except for size.
- Sonny Styles and Vega Ioane check every box except for positional value.
- Mansoor Delane clearly has 1st round tape, but height, arm length, and predicted speed could be issues.
- Trevor Goosby is a late risers, but otherwise checks every box, at a position of extreme value.
Keldric Faulk and Spencer Fano more understandable because their tape is more erratic, but we''ve seen before that these kind of prospects do not last.
You could also argue that Peter Woods does not belong on the list based on his 2025 tape. Any such list is somewhat arbitrary.
Rather than some imaginary "1st round grade, I prefer to think about which players are virtual locks to go in the 1st round. Realistically, we should be thrilled if any fell to us in the late 1st.
If you look at Sam Teet's recent 2-round mock, all 21 of the players I listed went 1st round, and only 3 made it out of the top-20 (22 Lomo, 26 Sadiq, 27 Ioane):
Several trades in my latest mock for the 2026 NFL Draft help the Jets, Browns, Rams, and more reload for the future
sportstalk.substack.com
The potential 1st round picks after that have a lot more potential variance, IMO.