Off The Grid
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Messages
- 9,153
- Reaction score
- 4,341
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I know what you mean. I think I would trade it. I was at the 86 SB in NO. I went there with friends w/o tickets. We figured if we didn't get in we'd just go to one of the 4 million great bars and watch it there. We got end zone seats among 8 million Bears fans on the street for $300 per about 30 minutes before kickoff. When the Pats went ahead 3-0 in the first quarter, we went nuts giving Chicago fans crap. Major error, LOL.
1985. No question. Had just finished basic training and was away from home for the first time AND John "freaking" Hannah!!!!
Hot take: I choose neither. Who knows if we have this current run if we win either of those super bowls? Possibly changes the timeline of the franchise and screw everything up...
LukeWait a minute. Where the phuck were you stationed??
Arizona.Wait a minute. Where the phuck were you stationed??
'85 Bears were like '86 Mets - arrogant and inferior.
Wait a minute. Where the phuck were you stationed??
Luke
Arizona.
The Jets were “good” even in 1986.
They started out 10-1...but in typical Jets Fashion, needed up 10-6.
85.
If Bledsoe had a ring, he "might" have been given his job back (Brady was only 5-3 with not great stats when Bledsoe was ready) I have wondered if 96 had been won if he might not have lost his job.
BB wouldn't have given a rats fart about 1996
would not have been because of BB. Kraft might have overruled him at that time. BB was not yet who he became at that point. In fact I think you are likely wrong.
My favorite trivia from that Jets finish was after the 10th win, NBC studio commentator Paul McGuire predicted the Jets would not win another game. By week 16, the pregame show had replayed that prediction multiple times.
Agreed. Nobody was running on them thst year, especially late in the year.
Passing was a different matter, though, but it took having a smart attack and a fearless QB to execute it.
The Bears were awesome that year. Of course they did dare you to pass against their incredible pass rush, but only Marino could, that's one team.
The New York Sack Exchange.Yeah, but that was because their Defensive Line got gutted by injuries.
They lost 3 Starters ~ Marty Lyons and my boys Joe Klecko and Mark Gastineau over the course of about 5 freaking minutes, it seemed.
Christ, I loved that Jets Front Line. Being a Pats Fan never cost me appreciation for another team's excellence, and that Soylent Green Defense was nasty!!
I see a one score game going into the fourth quarter.
85 had a better all around roster, but 96 had the better HC and QB.
That was a Monday Night Game in FishTown and McMahon didn't play.
The squishy fish play the Bears that Year on a neutral sight?
The same Fish that we stomped in Miami??
46-10 is nothing compared to what the Bears would've done to them.
Against MIA on MNF? Steve Fuller started.McMahon played
McMahon played
Yeah. 6 Passes worth. In the 4th Quarter after it was all over.
I didn't say zero Snaps, genius.
Fuller started that game because McMahon was hurt.
McMahon only mopped up.
I repeat: an healthy McMahon starts the Super Bowl against the Fish ~ which he did not do in Miami ~ and it's a greater slaughter even than what the Bears put down on us.