Search results

Wot? Isn’t the “blind side” the side opposite the side that a quarterback’s torso and hips are facing? Why does that change in the shotgun?

Bedard has spoken highly of Eleumenor’s LT film

What kind of minor foot injury would result in a 300 pound dancing bear being ruled out so quickly? Fearing the worst, hoping for the best.

You sound like Randolph Duke

Because this is likely a media-driven case and the media and the public thinks “federal lawsuit” is more serious than “lawsuit”, when really it’s just a lawsuit that meets the requirements for federal court jurisdiction (in this case, the parties reside in different states and the amount in...

Where has THIS Andy Johnson been all these years!? Good show, old boy!

It’s not sufficiently accurate to be admissible in court, but it is a data point that law enforcement can and will consider in the course of its investigation.

Professional athletes hate 1. Gold diggers and 2. The Media. The fact is that this type of story, pushed potentially by a combination of 1 and 2, is more likely to bring the team together, than to tear it apart.

They had not heard about the lawsuit or it’s specific allegations before it was filed. That’s PR speak that admits nothing, says nothing. It doesn’t foreclose the possibility that they were aware of the situation.

....One more time. I’m all for anti-vilification, anti-quick judgment. She made the allegations. He denies them. No evidence has been presented other than he said/she said and quite frankly, in my career as a lawyer, I can tell you that’s worth nothing as far as “the truth” is concerned. Let’s...

You are watching a different world than I am. I don’t believe we can relate on any level. Farewell.

Can you share with us an example, in the past 10 years, where a female accuser has been “instantly vilified in the media”? Each new piece of your expressed worldview is more confounding than the last.

Step out of your binary, black and white perception of the world. Most likely neither party is lying about anything major. They are both subconsciously subtly shading what actually happened to avoid cognitive dissonance about the way they view themselves. Every human does this. They are both...

Are you suggesting that a document that is drafted by professional lawyer to to tell a story that is 100% favorable to his or her client and 100% unfavorable to the other side actually paints the client in a good light and the other side as scum???? Welcome to the World of Litigation, pal!

Yes, often. There are no statistics but why would human nature be suspended in only this one area of the human experience?

Keep trying. While it almost never lives up to it, our legal system is based upon moral precepts. This is because accusers often have impure motives and/or their memories are often subconsciously modified to conform to a falsely virtuous self-image. Accusers often THINK they are telling the...

That the Patriots may end up slaying the NFL, Goodell, the ‘72 Dolphins and the Me-too movement all in a single year is a tantalizing possibility.

I love how people can only see these types of situations as he said/she said or one person is telling the truth, one is lying. In reality, something happened, and he probably thinks he did nothing wrong and she thinks he did something terrible. The brain and confirmation bias blur just enough...

Her behavior and his messages to her all point toward a money grab. Why on earth would we assume he is guilty and why would the Patriots react negatively until some of the evidence starts to point the other way??Also, the idea that Rosenhaus didn’t disclose this to the Patriots is absurd. They...

. Your first point casually undermines concepts of fundamental fairness and due process that have formed the underpinnings of western civilization for almost 1,000 years. You should not be able to vote.