Search results

I don't get it. We trade Hoyer and #27 for a conditional 2013 pick? edit: sorry, I see the other thread now.

What makes you think the forum wants to read that BS on every goddamn thread?

There`s nothing delusional about liking Devon Still at 27. There`s absolutely no provocation for this insult. Clean it up.

Nothing against those two, but going all offense in the first round is a fail in my books.

Thinking about where value meets need in this draft, I have come to the conclusion that I like any mock that includes the following: 2 front seven defenders in the first round one FS/CB in the second round a total of 2 FS/CB and 2 OL in rounds 2-4 That would suit me fine. Hopefully...

my vote too

MMQB yesterday. Dungy points out the (Redskins) game and play when Peyton's neck problems started. I don't think he identified Carter as the culprit though.

Good luck with the manuscript. :p Also, you'll be missed.

So when does FA/new league year begin?

I'm not sure I agree with your premise that there have been two long-term dynasties in the NFL since 1980. I'd like to know what the criteria. SF's dynasty seems to come to an end by late to mid nineties. I wonder what Denver's record is from 1986 - 1999 or so. And if we go by 11 year...

I don't see a real reason to trade up. Positionally, I'm most interested in a DT/DE in the first round and there should be a decent one available at #27. I think there are six that are probably mid-first to early-second round talent in Poe, Brockers, Still, Cox, Worthy and Reyes.

I haven't specifically looked at every team's needs but I think that one or two from Poe, Brockers, Cox, Still, Worthy and Reyes will be there for the taking at 27. I wouldn't mind any of them at the cost of #27, but prefer the first four a little more (enough to move up a bit once three of...

The thread's official, not the tags.

I was going to update mine, but without looking at the rankings again, I doubt I could do any better than this. so I'll just call this one mine too.

And you were the only one. Does this mean you were a better evaluator than everybody else? No. Blind squirrels find nuts. Thanks for bringing this example to our attention.

Wow. Good work. Didn't care for the draft much at first (especially after reading the Jeffrey rumour), but after seeing the offseason that preceded it, it made a lot of sense. It looks like you see a lot of 4-3 defence in the future, which accounts for lack of DT in the draft, as well as...

Yes. And we would have been right. When ascertaining value, one isn't permitted the benefit of hindsight.

I see that Kiper (I know) has Still, Cox, Brockers, Worthy and Poe all ranked between 14 and 22 on his Big Board. I'd love to come away with two of these guys, but do we have to trade up just to get one? Perhaps Belichick will wait until two of Still/Cox/Brockers are off the board, then...

It's not beyond the realm of possibility that BB could allocate his free agent dollars elsewhere. He could use Edelman in the slot, and bring in better (than Chad and Deion) wideouts. We'd still have strong options in the middle with Edelman, Gronk and Hernandez. I'm not saying this will or...

It's pretty bleeding obvious that I posted that before the game. Mallet was a first round talent in his draft year. Cassel was undrafted. I think the comparison ends there.