Search results

This is exactly it. We all got to sit there and watch people take premature victory laps for their opinions while mocking those who disagreed. These same people are later shown to be wrong and it's suddenly not appropriate to criticize.

I'm still Team Bill but this is definitely on point.

What are you taking about? I told you I didn't disagree that armchair experts get it wrong. So no "ignorance" there. The "penultimate" comment in your previous reply was "Nobody on this website has any, aside from Ian" referring to "accountability". What are you getting at and when are you...

Ignorant of what?

So you're telling me the armchair experts get it wrong sometimes too. I agree. What point do you think you're making with this?

I think there are likely plenty of successful people here who could pull the "do you know who I am" card, even if their success is in other fields. The only people here who've seen my LinkedIn were Dingleberry and Kontra, who aren't here to vouch for me, but you have my personal information. You...

Goodness we're here to wash Ken's balls not Ian's. You can start another thread for that or pick it up again in the "What About Us" PatsFans' members coaching/GM candidates thread.

Lol, thanks for posting these links. I didn't realize Kontra called @Rob0729 out on his BS as much as he did, no wonder Rob was so happy he got banned. Rob in a vigorous and endless defence of Patricia being wholly qualified for OC duties and his assurance we could expect competence from...

Those threads were hilarious, you weren't kidding.

I guess... Congratulations?

If we're being honest, Rob does serve a purpose as the moronic takes guy that can make board discussions more interesting.

People called out his mental fortitude too. At the very least that's foreseeing the potential for the psychological breakdown we saw along with his play.

Just because they may have criticized the o-line generally for that game doesn't mean their opinion aligned with yours on that specific play. More nonsense.

Come on Ian, "anybody but Mac" is essentially the same thing. Plenty of people did not trust him to start. Whether that's because he would continue to suck and throw INTs, or he would really suck and throw even more INTs, is a distinction without a meaningful difference.

You don't have to effectively come to Rob's defence acting like what you and he did were the same thing. They were wildly different.

Why didn't you post their opinion on that specific play then? I think you're lying again.

Basically the distinction I was making between him and Rob.

I'm certain I heard several people say "anybody but Mac" even last year. And I don't blame the Pats for picking him, it seemed like a great idea at the time. It seemed like an even better idea halfway through his first year.

Multiple people explained why you were wrong with images and your own video. Then you tried to say Mac only had 2 seconds to throw because he was hit at the 2 seconds mark of the video even though the video started well after the snap and Mac was already finished his drop. Then you stopped...

You didn't blindly praised Mac. You very clearly looked for positives if any could be found and hoped for improvement. You may have gone overboard on your search for positives but hoping for improvement is not the same thing as saying he's great and it's everyone else's fault. Plenty of people...