UFA has not officially started but from the reported signings they have decided not to go after big names and focus on 2nd tier or lower ufa’s.
They have let some players walk as well.
Overall I see them so far as not having meaningfully improved the team.
Where they re picking in the draft they might get 2 starters.
I think they take a step back next year
"Meaningfully" improved is somewhat subjective. Not sure exactly what your threshold is for meaningfully.
On the OL, it's Bradbury out, AVT in. Obviously a huge upgrade in caliber of player with health. But also a massive health risk that would leave us with Ben Brown starting, who couldn't beat out Bradbury this year. It also feels like Wilson should be better this year at C than he was at LG, but that's somewhat speculative. The depth, as of right now, is worse with Lowe gone and Munford unsigned.
FB is obviously better, but it's a lesser position. None of us can honestly say improving at FB is on an even playing level with other positions. So it goes back to the subjectivity of "meaningful".
Jones is probably better than Chaisson on the EDGE, but again, what is "meaningful" improvement? The loss of Jennings means depth is worse on paper.
Byard has a better track record than Hawkins, but Hawkins played well last year by many metrics. Byard is also older and probably in a decline phase somewhat, so how much "meaningful" improvement is 2026 Byard over 2025 Hawkins?
People will compare the LB they signed to Tavai, but right now Gibbens is gone too. So they seem to have downgraded at rotational LB and less depth overall. This is a spot I'm watching for more news at, hopefully with a vet stop gap signing if not just Gibbens back for less than the tender.
The Doubs for Diggs swap has been discussed ad nauseum. Raw statistics, looks like a downgrade, but underlying metrics and some projection of a bigger role and many think it's a lateral move. We'll see.
The TE they signed looks like a quality blocker and roster worthy player, but a very different type than Hooper. It seems a better compliment to Henry, though.
I think it's fair to say none of these are "meaningful" improvements, but there's lots of small, incremental improvement. The question is whether that's cumulative enough to be meaningful. The other key factor would be how the improvement of players on the roster (usually from young guys) weighs against guys on the team who decline (usually old guys, which we have very few of). For instance, it's possible Jared Wilson makes a huge leap this year and really improves the interior OL but Moses shows age related decline and/or Onwenu just comes in fat like he did a couple years ago and it's net decline even with a leap. Also have to see what they get out of the draft.