PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Patriots Player Departure Stefon Diggs Cut.

You're mis-reading what I'm stating. I did not state that the automatic conversion was in the contract. On the contrary. I stated that the clause requiring teams to get player approval for the Salary Cap to Signing Bonus conversion was a standard part of the contracts up until 2011 CBA negotiations. It was then that I believe the approval clause was removed from the standard contracts. However, I also stated that some teams had KEPT the Approval clause in their new contracts and that the Patriots were one of the last teams to keep doing it. For contracts w/o the approval clause, teams can do the conversion without player approval.

And you seem to be misunderstanding mine, which is that there are no clauses in the standard contract related to unilateral conversion of salary into signing bonuses at all, and there haven't been since at least 1998. I literally looked at the standard contracts in the CBAs just before posting.

So teams have to affirmatively negotiate that into the contract; the Patriots may not do so, but it's not them leaving in something most teams have removed.
 
Pierce averaged over 20 yard per reception 2 years in a row. I think his stats were hurt by being on field with Downs, Pittman and the fact they wanted to run the ball. They did not use him in a position to be a volume receiver.

QB's were bad: There were many plays the throws were just so bad that the targets to catches is very misleading. I think the Jaguars game he had 5 targets and zero catches. Wasn't a bad game by him. I believe one play he got behind the defense by 10 yards and the pass was underthrown by 10 yards and knocked down by defender.
Against Denver, I believe, there were 4 plays he had a chance at a long play or long TD and the QB made a bad throw or did not throw to him.

Pierce is a risk because he has improved so much from year 1 to year 4 based on work ethic not elite skills and he has not been asked to carry the load as #1. Reading Colts fans take the end of the year many were calling him the #1 receiver, and they were upset the Colts were not treating him like that and getting him the ball more. Wasn't their offense to do that though.

I see almost ZERO chance you regret the contract; I do see a chance he's not quite the level you were hoping. But also a CHANCE he gets 100 receptions and 1500 yards with 10 TD's regularly with Maye.

To me he's a calculated risk to get a solid to good #1 receiver in his prime. I just see the odds better doing that than the alternatives.

I will also say many teams he would not be a good fit for a 1 WR. The fact he'd be pared with Maye and they suit each other perfectly makes him worth it. The fact many teams would not be a good fit opens it up for the Pats to get him as well.





People said the same about Alvin Harper when he signed with Tampa and Donald Hayes when he signed with the Patriots. I can remember Pats fans all being super excited because we had Tom Brady, who had just pulled off the SB upset, throwing to Hayes. We know that Hayes bombed out here and was gone after a season.

I don't have your enthusiasm in regards to Pierce. I see a guy who is the beneficiary of being the #3 Receiver behind Pittman and Downs and teams having to respect the running game that has Taylor. I really haven't taken an issue with the number of targets he's getting. I have an issue with the number of catches he's making.

Along the lines of Pierce not getting the same snaps/targets, my concern is that Pierce wasn't facing other teams top corners. Not with Pittman/Downs on the field as well. If Pierce is facing a teams 3rd/4th CB, then I would expect him to flourish and have deeper plays. Did you notice who he was going up against? How many times did he face Stingley when the Colts played Houston? Did Pierce face off against McDuffie when they played the Chiefs? Or against Witherspoon when Indy played the Seahawks? Or Surtain when the Colts played the Broncos? Or Montaric Brown when Indy play Jax?

If you go back and look and say that he was getting covered by the other teams #1Corner, then I might have reason to believe he could be better if paired with Maye.. But I've not seen that,. Though I can admit I didn't do the deep dive you did. I saw Pierce going up against 3rd/4th CBs.
 
And you seem to be misunderstanding mine, which is that there are no clauses in the standard contract related to unilateral conversion of salary into signing bonuses at all, and there haven't been since at least 1998. I literally looked at the standard contracts in the CBAs just before posting.

So teams have to affirmatively negotiate that into the contract; the Patriots may not do so, but it's not them leaving in something most teams have removed.

I'm not misunderstanding anything.

This was discussed ad nauseum during the 2011 season whenf the change occurred and further along when the Pats were still putting the clause into their contracts that other teams had since removed. Despite the change in the CBA as of 2011 that allowed them to actually do so, unilaterally.
 
I don't see Pierce as a true WR1 franchise receiver...I think he's a very good WR2. Chris Hogan had to play WR1 when the team had injuries and it didn't go that well which IMO was not his fault....that just wasn't his gig...he didn't have the talent. I also have concerns about Pierce's catch percentage. But I do think he would fit in well with how the team spreads the ball around.
 
I'm not defending him at all, but have you considered that he was playing through a broken finger? Stefon Diggs says he's been dealing with broken finger
He had a whopping 3 drops on the season, so the broken finger didn’t affect him. On the other hand, what you could see was his inability to separate the entire season. Almost every catch was met with a tackler where he was constantly resorting to karate to get them off him. He reminded me of a 1999 Terry Allen and 2005 Corey Dillon who both had fallen off cliffs. Pats clearly saw that with Diggs.

Diggs already hinted his situation after the Super Bowl, so he's not blind sided by the decision.
 
He had a whopping 3 drops on the season, so the broken finger didn’t affect him. On the other hand, what you could see was his inability to separate the entire season. Almost every catch was met with a tackler where he was constantly resorting to karate to get them off him. He reminded me of a 1999 Terry Allen and 2005 Corey Dillon who both had fallen off cliffs. Pats clearly saw that with Diggs.

Diggs already hinted his situation after the Super Bowl, so he's not blind sided by the decision.

A broken finger doesn't only affect your ability to catch the ball though. It seemed like a lot of teams were playing him tight at the LOS and it's hard to shed those defenders at the line when it's painful to grab anything. It also didn't help that he was double teamed for most of the season, which is part of the reason Boutte was open a lot more.
 
A broken finger doesn't only affect your ability to catch the ball though. It seemed like a lot of teams were playing him tight at the LOS and it's hard to shed those defenders at the line when it's painful to grab anything. It also didn't help that he was double teamed for most of the season, which is part of the reason Boutte was open a lot more.
I'll give you you that it may affect him at the LOS, but he had guys glued on him after every catch in man coverage. First, posters defended him over his ACL, now it's a finger. It doesn't seem like the Pats bought that either.

Regarding the double teams, I'd like to see a source on that because it didn't seem like that at all. No need to.
 
Last edited:
If you go back and look and say that he was getting covered by the other teams #1Corner, then I might have reason to believe he could be better if paired with Maye.. But I've not seen that,. Though I can admit I didn't do the deep dive you did. I saw Pierce going up against 3rd/4th CBs.
Since he was the far outside receiver most of the time he was almost always matched up with the 1 or 2 corner.
I just watched DJ Moore tape. Moore is a good player, Pierce Tape was better.

Pierce was matched up against an opposing No. 1 or No. 2 cornerback on nearly 90% of his perimeter snaps

I was surprised by him on tape. After watching Patriots receivers all year on tape, he gets me excited, he was better than what we had.

I can't compare to historical guys as just basing it on watching his tape vs. other receivers playing now.


Other data

Strategic Impact​

  • Shadow Coverage: Pierce saw an uptick in shadow coverage in the latter half of 2025. Defenses shifted their primary focus to him following a stretch where he averaged over 90 receiving yards per game (Weeks 7–11).



  • Vertical Gravity: Even when not targeted, Pierce's matchup data shows he was a "top-two" priority for defenses. Tracking data indicates he faced a safety capped over the top on roughly 45% of his deep routes, a testament to the respect he commanded from top-tier corners.
  • The "No. 2" Advantage: In games where Pittman drew the true No. 1 (like vs. Sauce Gardner or Jalen Ramsey), Pierce consistently torched No. 2 corners, leveraging his 4.41 speed against defenders who lacked the elite recovery speed to match him vertically.

Summary​

Pierce faced a No. 1 or No. 2 cornerback on roughly 85-90% of his snaps, as he rarely moves into the slot (less than 15% of his routes). By the end of the 2025 season, he was increasingly treated as a co-WR1 by defensive coordinators, often drawing the opponent's best deep-ball specialist.
 
I'll give you you that it may affect him at the LOS, but he had guys glued on him after every catch in man coverage. First, posters defended him over his ACL, now it's a finger. It doesn't seem like the Pats bought that either.

Regarding the double teams, I'd like to see a source on that because it didn't seem like that at all. No need to.

As I said earlier, I am not defending him & I agree with you that he seemed to slow down as the season progressed. I was hoping he was going to push through it, but he really only had one year to prove he was worth that big second year and he failed. I'm bummed, but it's the NFL - no player is here for very long. Well, usually.
 
I suspect that we continue to confuse top 10 receivers in the NFL with a team's top starting WR. For example, Diggs was clearly the #1 WR (of 6) on a team that went to the Super Bowl.
====
The market for such players seems to be around $20M AAV. Diggs was cut when the team decided to move on because of legal concerns. As an aside, the contract was structured so that the team could get out reasonably after a year or extend him. I pointed out that this would happen before his bonus was (if it were going to happen). Folks corrected me and said that the bonus was non-existent.

In any case, Vrabel was able to make a straightforward decision. He decided to move on.
 
As I said earlier, I am not defending him & I agree with you that he seemed to slow down as the season progressed. I was hoping he was going to push through it, but he really only had one year to prove he was worth that big second year and he failed. I'm bummed, but it's the NFL - no player is here for very long. Well, usually.
I didn't mean to imply that you were defending him as you prefaced that in your initial post. I was glad he chose to sign with NE as he really didn't have to. There must have been a mutual understanding when he signed that the Pats may chose not to honor the year 2 salary. If not, I'm sure we'll hear something from Diggs down the road.
 
Since he was the far outside receiver most of the time he was almost always matched up with the 1 or 2 corner.
I just watched DJ Moore tape. Moore is a good player, Pierce Tape was better.

Pierce was matched up against an opposing No. 1 or No. 2 cornerback on nearly 90% of his perimeter snaps

I was surprised by him on tape. After watching Patriots receivers all year on tape, he gets me excited, he was better than what we had.

I can't compare to historical guys as just basing it on watching his tape vs. other receivers playing now.


Other data

Strategic Impact​

  • Shadow Coverage: Pierce saw an uptick in shadow coverage in the latter half of 2025. Defenses shifted their primary focus to him following a stretch where he averaged over 90 receiving yards per game (Weeks 7–11).



  • Vertical Gravity: Even when not targeted, Pierce's matchup data shows he was a "top-two" priority for defenses. Tracking data indicates he faced a safety capped over the top on roughly 45% of his deep routes, a testament to the respect he commanded from top-tier corners.
  • The "No. 2" Advantage: In games where Pittman drew the true No. 1 (like vs. Sauce Gardner or Jalen Ramsey), Pierce consistently torched No. 2 corners, leveraging his 4.41 speed against defenders who lacked the elite recovery speed to match him vertically.

Summary​

Pierce faced a No. 1 or No. 2 cornerback on roughly 85-90% of his snaps, as he rarely moves into the slot (less than 15% of his routes). By the end of the 2025 season, he was increasingly treated as a co-WR1 by defensive coordinators, often drawing the opponent's best deep-ball specialist.

If that's the case, you can tell me how he did against Stingley, McDuffie, Witherspoon, Surtain and Brown.

Is it you saying that Pierce was matched up against the No1 or No2 corner or is it an AI?? Half your post looks like you copied and pasted it.
 
The "restructure" we're talking about is changing Salary to signing bonus. That moves it from "earned income" to "unearned income" and it's taxed at a higher rate.

While it's just an "accounting action" from the Salary Cap standpoint that allows teams to amortize the "signing bonus" over a period of time, it has definite tax implications.

Contrary to Rainmaker, the CBA removed the clause from the standard contract that players could refuse the "restructure". Two teams kept the clause in their contracts. One of the two was the Patriots under Belichick. However, I don't know if that is still the case.

@Miguel - Do you now if the Pats still have the clause in their contracts that allow players to refuse the conversion of Salary to Signing bonus? Or was that changed with Belichick leaving?
The Patriots were the last team in the NFL to make standard the ability for the teams to automatically convert salary into signing bonus. I forgot when that exactly happened. Think it was after BB left. I know their contracts prior to March 2022 did not have the automatic conversion clause.
 
People are going to hate this but I think Chism is going to be their replacement for Diggs in the slot. I think he will do well, but I doubt many will share that sentiment.
 
If that's the case, you can tell me how he did against Stingley, McDuffie, Witherspoon, Surtain and Brown.

Is it you saying that Pierce was matched up against the No1 or No2 corner or is it an AI?? Half your post looks like you copied and pasted it.

Disagree on this DaBruinz, KCSeven has consistently been posting well researched and well thought out posts. I think he knows what he's talking about. That doesn't mean I always agree with him, but he brings the receipts.
 
People said the same about Alvin Harper when he signed with Tampa and Donald Hayes when he signed with the Patriots. I can remember Pats fans all being super excited because we had Tom Brady, who had just pulled off the SB upset, throwing to Hayes. We know that Hayes bombed out here and was gone after a season.

I don't have your enthusiasm in regards to Pierce. I see a guy who is the beneficiary of being the #3 Receiver behind Pittman and Downs and teams having to respect the running game that has Taylor. I really haven't taken an issue with the number of targets he's getting. I have an issue with the number of catches he's making.

Along the lines of Pierce not getting the same snaps/targets, my concern is that Pierce wasn't facing other teams top corners. Not with Pittman/Downs on the field as well. If Pierce is facing a teams 3rd/4th CB, then I would expect him to flourish and have deeper plays. Did you notice who he was going up against? How many times did he face Stingley when the Colts played Houston? Did Pierce face off against McDuffie when they played the Chiefs? Or against Witherspoon when Indy played the Seahawks? Or Surtain when the Colts played the Broncos? Or Montaric Brown when Indy play Jax?

If you go back and look and say that he was getting covered by the other teams #1Corner, then I might have reason to believe he could be better if paired with Maye.. But I've not seen that,. Though I can admit I didn't do the deep dive you did. I saw Pierce going up against 3rd/4th CBs.
Dude give it up.
Who are “people”?
Can you point me to when Donald Hayes had a 20 yards per catch production that caused people to say that?
You are down to 1 example in 30 years who isn’t even close to a good comp who never had close to the 1000 yard season Pierce just had.

How is Pierce the “#3 receiver behind Pittman and Downs”?
Downs had 566 yards Pierce had 1003.
Pierce played 813 snaps in 15 games downs played 566
Pittman played 918 in 17 games and had 784 yards.
Pierce played the most snaps per game and had the most receiving yards. He was the 1.
You are a moron if you think that Josh Downs was getting more coverage priority than Pierce. Or you are lying to dig out of your hole I’ve out yourself in.

You are surely lying if you say you saw Pierce going against 3rd or 4th corners.
 
People are going to hate this but I think Chism is going to be their replacement for Diggs in the slot. I think he will do well, but I doubt many will share that sentiment.
You never know. Danny Amendola was supposed to be the Wes Welker replacement, but it turned out to be Julian Edelman. Chism will absolutely get his shot in camp as Douglas just doesn't seem to take that next step.
 
Disagree on this DaBruinz, KCSeven has consistently been posting well researched and well thought out posts. I think he knows what he's talking about. That doesn't mean I always agree with him, but he brings the receipts.
Dabruinz made the dumbest ever post comparing Pierce to Donald Hayes. Now rather than recognizing how stupid that was he us doubling down by questioning a poster who went and studied the film and making things up like Josh downs was ahead of Pierce on the depth chart and played more snaps to come up with some kind of lame excuse for his horrible reasoning.
Soon it will get ugly and he will start insulting people.
 
You never know. Danny Amendola was supposed to be the Wes Welker replacement, but it turned out to be Julian Edelman. Chism will absolutely get his shot in camp as Douglas just doesn't seem to take that next step.

I agree. I'm a believer in Chism, but I understand why others are skeptical.
 
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Patriots News 03-29, Mock Draft 1.0, Tight End Draft Profiles
Back
Top