- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 43,554
- Reaction score
- 24,138
Except it wasn't conservative. But you clearly can't be bothered to pay attention to what happened. You don't know what conservative play-calling actually is. That's the problem here.Yes the Pats offense was pathetic for much of the game with conservative play calling.
After the second TD in the first they went fumble, punt, end of half, punt, punt punt. They gained 48 yards for almost 3 quarters.
The fumble wasn't because of "conservative" play-calling. They'd already hit Agholor for 27 on that series. They were going for a longer pass again when Jones got sacked. That, right there, destroys your claim of conservative play calling.
The first two plays on the series that had the blocked punt were check downs because of the pressure Dallas was bringing. But why bother with facts.
What play were the Pats running on Gregory's 2nds sack? Hmm.. OH.. A deeper passing play.. But, no.. They weren't being aggressive.
Yep. You got one right. The bad Bolden Run call.. Great job..
The 3rd punt.. They had a 6 yard run and a 9 yard run.. The Pass to Henry was a check-down. Then a Meyers drop. Yep.. Such bad play-calling. SMH..
Your 48 yards claim is a bunch of crap. They had 72 yards in the 2nd and 3rd quarters. But it was from poor execution. Not Bad play-calling. Helps to watch the game and not just fire off with what you THINK happened vs. what ACTUALLY happened.