JSn
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2008
- Messages
- 7,428
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I think he is saying he (BB) wants to see more of Cassel, Guet, and O'connel
It is my understanding that the Pats go to MGH for MRI's, etc. I've seen Colvin, Asante, Bruschi and others there. When my wife was delivering in April a nurse told me that they are the official hospital of the Patriots and as a matter of fact Kraft gifted them 8 SB (XLII) tix which were raffled off-she also said that tix are also raffled off for regular season games as well and have been for some time now.
I doubt the Pats would drop off Brady for an MRI on the way to the airport for Tampa, so the fact that they fly out of Providence is irrelevant to where Brady would go for an MRI.
So it's just a coincidence that well before the media (Reiss) reports Brady's no travel - foot, that two Pats message boards have reports of people seeing him at the RI hospital MRI facility.
So it's just a coincidence that well before the media (Reiss) reports Brady's no travel - foot, that two Pats message boards have reports of people seeing him at the RI hospital MRI facility.
Can we please stop with the mad scientist messing with everyone thing? The last time we heard that BS on this board was that BB was having Brady fake an ankle injury. Remember that game?
There is a difference between the preseason and the playoffs. Healthy players magically have injuries that are either nothing or non-existent that force them out of games all the time in preseason especially if they want to audition that player's back ups. besides, would you really want to put Brady into a line up where his blind side is being protected by Wesley Britt?
There is nothing about Belichick being a mad scientist, it is about Belichick potentially doing what I wouldn't put past 31 other head coaches doing. Comparing this preseason game to the Super Bowl is apples and oranges.
Do you really think that if this was a real game that Brady wouldn't have made the trip. Even Brady this week illuded to the fact that he might not even play a single down all preseason.
I believe Brady's medical condition is termed..." OLinesuckicitis"
I don't mean to question any of your "sources," but why would Tom Brady be going to RI for an MRI??
I don't think there is anything wrong with Tom that a little rest won't cure, if at all-maybe an "injured foot" is the excuse the Pats are using not to play him with Goodell's new edict on integrity of pre-season games. The Chargers had to do the same for Tomlinson. I believe this is another way BB is managing his roster and it's quite obvious we need to find out now if Cassel or Gutz can play with the big boys. It's better to do that now vs in an important reg season game in December.
I really like Mike Reiss and his dispassionate analysis.However,he borders on being a shill for the team.(take a breath...I said "borders").
crap, tom still has the ankle injury!
Borders? That is like saying Gisele border on being good looking.
Reiss is a virtual employee of the Pats but I still love the little guy. He trades access for Patriot PR, and he works his butt off to get fans accurate information. Lets hope his next report is not more serious.
I really like Mike Reiss and his dispassionate analysis.However,he borders on being a shill for the team.(take a breath...I said "borders").
He attributes the report on Brady to "NFL Sources",which could be anyone who ever had any dealings with the NFL since it's inception(post 1920).
It seems to me that he was given the story,asked to hold it until the team was on the way to Tampa and then release it.
To say TB was "resting his foot" smacks of BB
disinformation and if Reiss was a part of this,he is doing a disservice to both his readers and to the team he covers.
If you're reading this board,Mike,prove me wrong by following up with more detail.
At the least,give your opinion as to whether an MRI was involved.
| 18 | 529 |
| 13 | 527 |
| 31 | 1K |
| 11 | 495 |
| 9 | 605 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 20 - May 5 (Through 26yrs)











