- Joined
- May 1, 2008
- Messages
- 21,674
- Reaction score
- 13,788
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Not quite.We seem to almost have a censensus already.
It seems that almost all would be happy with
1) Miller or Iheanchor
2) trade up for the best EDGE rusher we can get
3) best TE available
BPA the whole way for me. Must be Patriots type players with the value of positon factored in. QB1 is the only position that can be completely ignored.Not quite.
I’m pretty much with you except add LT and C to the QB1. Eg if both RT’s are gone, maybe go Edge then LB, or possibly take LB Rodriguez at 31 if we like him the best.BPA the whole way for me. Must be Patriots type players with the value of positon factored in. QB1 is the only position that can be completely ignored.
There are no critical needs that absolutely must be filled by the draft for 2026. But there are multiple potential holes and cap casulties for 2027.
Adams' favorite selection came in 2005 when the team stayed in its No. 32 slot and tabbed Fresno State offensive lineman Logan Mankins.
"He was clear and away the best player on our board. We knew he would come in and play for us," he recalled.
That comes back to the foundation of what Adams believes gives a team the best chance to hit on a late first-round pick -- grade every player honestly and don't reach for need.
"Whoever you take there is going to be on your team, you're married to it unless it's a disaster. So we're trying to answer the question, 'Who has the best chance to help us win football games?' Which comes down to best player there," he said.
"You might say, 'We need a linebacker in the worst way' and there's an OK linebacker but a big-time offensive lineman. Then when you draft him, what you have is an average linebacker and you just passed up a really good player. Two years from now, nobody is going to think, 'Did they fill a need?' They'll say, 'Wow, they got a really good player.'"
Mankins went on to play nine seasons in New England and is a four-time finalist for the team's Hall of Fame.
The Seahawks can't resort to drafting for need, just for the sake of replacing lost talent. It’s absolutely critical they just keep adding the best possible players.
Kayden McDonald isn’t a big need but would present tremendous value at #32. [Josiah] Trotter isn’t a big need but would be a very solid pick at #64. If they’re the highest graded players on your board, well above the players at positions considered bigger needs, they should be considered.
I think we should be very open-minded about the positions the Seahawks target in this draft. The only position they didn’t add to in free agency was pass-rush — and it seems fairly likely they will draft an EDGE rusher at some point. Aside from that, the board should always do the work. They don’t need to force anything here.
I’ll also add — this team won with physicality and by beating opponents up with great defense and winning in the trenches. Players who bring even more quality and physicality to the defensive front seven and the offensive line — to me — feel like the best opportunity to continue building the team you want to be.
Yup. 2nd and 3rd level on the defense, and TE and WR. But need to fill out the trenches.We could come out of yhe draft without addressing EITHER OT or EDGE, and still have a great draft.
Imagine:
31. Caleb Banks, Kayden McDonald, Jacob Rodriguez, Jake Golday, or Keylan Rutledge
63. Any of the above, plus Chris Bell, Treydan Stukes. Keionte Scott
95. Ted Hurst, Eli Stowers, Kyle Louis, Oscar Delp
125. Sam Roush, Devin Moore, Kaleb Elarms-Orr, Will Kacmarek
We could address a lot of talent with some of those guys.
If we end up with Rodriguez-Stukes-Hurst-Roush, I will be both disappointed on who we missed and elated about who we got.
Eric Edholm's ideal first 2 picks for each team:
Urgency + force = violence.
And no, I am not Eric Edholm.
We seem to almost have a censensus already.
It seems that almost all would be happy with
1) Miller or Iheanchor
2) trade up for the best EDGE rusher we can get
3) best TE available
Manx has already referenced this from Ernie Adams elsewhere, but worth repeating:
Former Belichick aide brings insight to Patriots' No. 31 pick
Ernie Adams and the Belichick-led Patriots picked at bottom of Round 1 many times. Adams shares the strategy.www.espn.com
Yep...in recent days both have moved up. Consensus Big Board from same site still has Max within reach. Maybe that won't last for long..Max Iheanachor is really becoming a touch and go situation.
At NFL Mock Draft Database you can see at a glance where a player is being mocked in each individual mock they have from outside sources. Here is where Iheanachor has gone in the last 10 mocks.
27-27-28-29-31-28-17-23-23-23 (most recent first).
Blake Miller is even more problematic:
19-24-24-24-22-17-28-31-17-21
If it's just two or three spots, absolutely. I'd be much less happy giving up a 2nd rounder.Move up if needed.
| 28 | 1K |
| 109 | 7K |
| 327 | 9K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











