Pat the Pats Fan
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2021 Casino Champ
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 6,322
- Reaction score
- 5,003
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Or most teams believe health is more important than seeding or the opponent.Let it be known that the Chargers are 100% tanking this week because they clearly want to play New England in the WC round.
“Most teams” do not bench starters when they’re still jockeying for seeding.Or most teams believe health is more important than seeding or the opponent.
Injured starters? Sure they do. The Pats did too. Happens all the time.“Most teams” do not bench starters when they’re still jockeying for seeding.
Yeah, The criticism you get if your star player, especially QB, gets hurt just to have a different road game would be bad.Or most teams believe health is more important than seeding or the opponent.
Injured starters? Sure they do.
Did Herbert play a full game last week? Yes he did. Therefore he’s not so injured that he can’t play.The Pats did too. Happens all the time.
Yeah, The criticism you get if your star player, especially QB, gets hurt just to have a different road game would be bad.
That being said the evidence is mixed. Some teams come out rusty. I think NFL players bodies get used to a routine and easier to keep playing. Obviously the 1 seed avoids a game where you could be eliminated which is way better than a possible negative from sitting starters.
I think a HC has to know his team. McVay said his starters need the work so will play in week 18 where in the past he would rest starters.
Sample size is small, but 1 analysis done in the past showed NOT resting starters was a better move
Evidence Breakdown (2003-2010 Analysis)
A blog post analysis examining teams from 2003 to 2010 that had the opportunity to rest their starters identified the following results:
This means the teams that played their starters achieved a 100% success rate in reaching the conference championship round in that specific dataset, compared to less than 50% for those that rested players.
- Teams that rested starters: Of the 15 teams that clearly rested their starters, only seven had "good" outcomes (defined as reaching the conference championship), while eight did not.
- Teams that did not rest starters: The analysis identified six teams that either clearly did not rest their starters (five teams) or mostly did not (one team). All six of these teams achieved "good" outcomes.
No. Just no.Thanks. If the starter is playing injured I think the equation is different. The Chargers are resting Herbert because his left hand has not healed and he further injured his left arm last week. Like we are resting Landry and Spillane.
They are all injured. Lots of teams rest injured key starters in the last few weeks to not risk further injury. Playing hurt risks further injury. Avoiding losing Herbert for the playoffs is a lot more important than beating Denver in week 18. It is really that simple. Health is the number one consideration for any coach in any sport going into the playoffs.No. Just no.
Benching your superstar all world quarterback is not even remotely like “resting Landry and Spilane”.
Yeah he’s so injured that he hasn’t missed a single snap all of December.They are all injured. Lots of teams rest injured key starters in the last few weeks to not risk further injury. Playing hurt risks further injury. Avoiding losing Herbert for the playoffs is a lot more important than beating Denver in week 18. It is really that simple. Health is the number one consideration for any coach in any sport going into the playoffs.
I guess I am a fool and you are a genius.Yeah he’s so injured that he hasn’t missed a single snap all of December.
You’re a fool if you think this is about an injury that hasn’t sidelined him at all this past month.
Jaguars play at 10am, so the Pats will still have pressure to win and keep the #2 seed if the Jaguars win.
| 122 | 5K |
| 734 | 19K |
| 335 | 10K |
| 327 | 21K |
| 333 | 9K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











