PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Content Post Idle thoughts: The "lesson learned" edition.

This has an opening post with good commentary and information, which we definitely recommend reading.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Stevenson was decent for a change, but he'll have to show more consistency in gaining yards in the meat-and-potatoes job of running on early downs before I buy that there's been a renaissance. Every so often he shows a little something, and the blocking is a plus, but then he falls back into his three-yards-a-pop rut. That's been going on for a couple of years now. I still think we can do better in an early/every-down back, and I hope we to try snatch one mid-draft.

Henderson is still inconsistent in reading what's in front of him, then in acting on what he sees. He needs to think before he hits the nitrous button. It's almost as if he runs with his eyes closed. At itmes he really does just run into the nearest defender, It is as if he think she's paid to collide with people rather than move on down the field. The big plays are nice, but his size, his limitations as a blocker, and his struggles with consistency mean he'll never likely be an every-down back. He hasn't been as much of a factor as a pass catcher either as I had hoped. I think we still need our next Faulk, and it seems that Henderson, as nice an option as he occasionally can be, isn't that guy.

The O-line has been a really pleasant surprise. It helps, of course, to have our Boy Genius working his magic behind you.

The NFL need full-time, trained, regularly and rigorously evaluated refs. A bunch of aging plump hobbyists and unvetted DEI hires, left to their own devices, ain't ever gonna get it. I see no valid reason to accept incompetence in this important area as "part of the game." They already have the colleges doing their farm team work for free. They can afford to spend some dough on competent refs.

The red zone deficiencies on both sides of the ball will have to be a priority for next year. I suspect one or the other or both of these problems will boot us out of the playoffs this year, but that's OK.

I think this year is already a remarkable success for a team in eseentially the first year of a rebuild from the dismally-low state to which late-Belichick and Mayo had reduced the team

This is the worst " analysis" i have seen here in quite some time.
 
Come on, give a guy a bone. It's Christmas.
 
Apparently it hasn't occurred to people that in pro sports caucasions are the DEI hires. If they acted like certainwhite people we wouldn't be allowed to play, coach, or participate in any way.
 
Refs - The call on Boutte's near catch WAS horrible, but I find it hard to get THAT angry about it. Bad calls are simply part of the game.
The great war of attrition is coming to an end, and I don't see a team we can play over the course of the AFC end of the bracket who is NOT a team that can beat us. The Parity in the AFC is remarkable. T
Cannot accept that the refs on the field and in the replay book allowed that to stand. There are so many technological advances there has to be a better way of scrutinizing this type of play. I'm not so much angry, just more disappointed that the NFL has not evolved in situations such as this so they can avoid such egregious errors in plays such as this...
I agree about the "attrition" as it points to the need for versatile players who can provide depth in times of need... our team is not bad, but always room for improvement. Extending Ben Brown is a step in the right direction.
 
Cannot accept that the refs on the field and in the replay book allowed that to stand. There are so many technological advances there has to be a better way of scrutinizing this type of play. I'm not so much angry, just more disappointed that the NFL has not evolved in situations such as this so they can avoid such egregious errors in plays such as this...
I agree about the "attrition" as it points to the need for versatile players who can provide depth in times of need... our team is not bad, but always room for improvement. Extending Ben Brown is a step in the right direction.
You are right, that particular play is hard to explain OR defend as a matter of opinion. That's why BBs challenge rule makes such good sense. You see your DE strangled on a rush you can can throw the flag. BUT you only get to do it a very limited amount of times. So you can't do it every time you see something and the game doesn't slow down.
 
Last week's 2nd half was REALLY disappointing for the many reasons we discussed this entire week in the run up to tonight's game. We wanted to know if this team could overcome adversity, both on the field and in the medical tent. We wanted to know if the WHOLE 45 could win a tough game without all our "best" players. We wanted to know if Drake Maye could bring us back from behind in the 4th quarter. We wanted to know if the D was capable of making a big stop. Well, the answer to ALL of those questions turned out to be YES, and the overall toughness of this team can no longer be questioned. Granted throughout this game all the team's flaws could also be pointed out, especially on defense as body after body seemed to be limping to the sideline.


Of course, any recap of this game has to start with Drake Maye. 380+ yds, 70% completion rate, 102 passing rate, consistently throwing the ball successfully down field, standing up to myriad hits, (10) only to get up time and again with the same demeanor and calm presence that has characterized him all season. His 4th quarter come from behind effort pretty much checked the last box on his prodigious list of things to do. Now all he has to do is DO it again, and again, and again for the 15 years,


BTW- It wasn't perfect. He is responsible for 2 TO's, BOTH of which took points off the board after long drives. And the Pats once again had trouble turning long drives into TD's. I REALLY hope Josh takes a look at that l LONG designed run Drake made to ice the game and use it more often as part of the general offense. Not only would it be effective most of the time, but the threat of it would put more pressure on defense and take a defender out of the mix to cover him, like we have to do for Allen. I've been calling for this for weeks now. Josh isn't listening,


OL - Even though there were 10 QB hits and 3 sacks - I thought the pass protection was in general, pretty good, which was surprising considering the bodies that were dropping all night. When they rushed 4 the Ravens rarely got any pressure on Drake. The were more successful when they blitzed but didn't seem to do it as much as I would have. Kudos to the players, who hung in there all night, but also to Marrone and his staff, who continues to surprise us with the quality of play he is getting out of his backups. BTW, IIRC one of the sacks came when Drake just ran out of bounds on one roll out behind the LOS.


RB's - I am NOT as big a fan of Henderson and most are. Right now, his only move seems to be to use his speed to simply run away people, and when that isn't there, gain a couple of yards. Your VERY rarely see him use a cutback or hesitation to avoid tacklers like you see guys like Cooke do all the time. And he badly needs to add that aspect to his game and I suspect he will over time. But I kinda cringe when I hear him brought up as a potential rookie offensive player of the year. He is exciting for sure and every time he touches it, he can go a long way, but at this point in time, I don't think he can gain enough 4-6 yd gains consistently enough to carry a run game and be the #1, When he's healthy give him his touches, especially in the pass game, but not "starter" touches. Hopefully he will develop INTO that starter down the road. For now, I'm thrilled with the pick, but realistic too.

Stevenson on the other hand CAN give you those consistent kinds of positive gains you need to sustain a run game right now. On his TD run, he was constantly changing directions to break free. All together in his 8 carries averaged 6.5ypc. BTW- IIRC, since game 3 Stevenson has fumbled only once and recovered it and THAT one was over 10 games ago. Stevenson has been a VERY useful RB for us this season.


Receivers - IIRC, early in the game I thought Henry dropped one in the endzone that he usually catches, and there was the Boutte ball on the play he was tackled on that he usually catches, but other than those TOUGH catches, I thought the receivers ALL did a great job, with special Kudos to the "old man" for his 140yd day. Great catches abounded by Diggs, Hollins, Williams and Henry.

On WR's in general - This game reminded me of one back in the first dynasty. It was a big game against Pittsburgh, and they had a FIERCE run D, and for most of that game we played in a 5 wide formation and simply threw the ball a vast majority of the time and made their greatest defensive strength... irrelevant. I mean we threw the ball FORTY-FOUR times. Christ, we haven't gotten to 30 for most of the season. Most of the season we have been under 27 attempts and our couple of ventures into to the thirties, it's been under 32. 380 yds and it didn't look forced, just part of the game plan. And we got it with a solid but rather underwhelming group of WR's, an odd mix of older and younger players who are just very effective with a very good QB. Kind of like the WR room we had here for the better part of 20 years.

So, tell me, do we REALLY need to get a 30MM (or higher) FA next season to be successful? Or do we resign Boutte, and hope Kyle continues his slow progression into someone who EARNS more targets, Keep Diggs who should be at least as good as he is now, but with a better feel for Drake and Josh's offense, and perhaps Hollins who is older, but seems like a dependable guy to keep around and add a draft pick to develop. AND then spend that big money on the OL or add a couple of defensive speed LB's and better DB depth. This is the kind of bonus you get to have when you have a QB like Maye. You don't have to overpay on WR's to elevate your QB. Your QB elevates the receivers.


Defense - These guys should get the courage and effort award DESPITE the fact that only forced 2 punts and at times looked like jello against the Raven run, attack. Christ, Huntly was 9/10 passing Their passing attack had an 80% completion rate and their running attack ran for 171 yds or 5.2ypc and Henry averaged 7.1 himself with 2 TD's, so statistically this was a disaster that somehow turned into a reasonable 24 points given up. Not having their top 2 players to start with in Williams and Spillane was a bad start, but then Farmer, Durden, Tonga and Gregory all went out at some point in the game. I read where Jennings had snaps at DT last night. It was REALLY the whole roster stepping up.

One telling stat was that the #2, #3, and #4 tacklers last night were all DB's (Davis 8, Gonzo 7 Hawkins7) So yes, if you're asking, our DB's are all willing and ABLE tacklers, though I wish they didn't have to be so often. Our current LB corps will need to upgrade this off season. Not that these guys are bad, but not at a championship level. I'd put Spillane at that level, but I still wish he wasn't the top LB like he is now. The good news usually picks in the bottom 6 of the round see top LB's fall. I personally hope for top Edge guy. Maybe someone who falls because of an injury concern that we take a risk on.


Refs - The call on Boutte's near catch WAS horrible, but I find it hard to get THAT angry about it. Bad calls are simply part of the game. They just happen and there isn't anything you can do about except to move on to the next play. We fans can dwell on them forever if we want, but the team can't afford to. Granted this one was rather obvious and thus more frustrating than most, but fortunately Maye simply went back to work and quickly made the yardage back. I always like BB's suggestion on replays. You get 2 challenges, and you can challenge ANYTHING, and if you are right those 2 times, you get a 3rd, Then that's it, no more. Then the game is left in the hands of the humans, period. It's fair and adds a measure of strategy and second guessing to the game.


Next week. I see 2 scenarios. The Jets looked like they gave up yesterday, but division rivalries are funny. They COULD make this their Superbowl and give it their all to try and ruin our chance at the #1 seed and have ONE shining success this year. OR they can continue their current trend and suck for the highest pick they can get. My guess, if we go up 2+ scores early, they'll pack it in. However, if we let them stay in the game midway into the 3rd quarter, we'll end up in a dog fight. Glenn looks like a guy who CAN get them up on one last hoorah. But Vrabel is also a guy who can motivate, and I don't expect to lose this game even in NJ where we will hear a LOT of MVP chants. Bottom line, I don't see any scenario where we lose either of these next 2 games. Even a B game should win. The only thing I worry about are injuries, but we shall see.


The great war of attrition is coming to an end, and I don't see a team we can play over the course of the AFC end of the bracket who is NOT a team that can beat us. The Parity in the AFC is remarkable. The best chance we have to make sure we win in the first round is to get the BYE, and we will need some help in that end. KC isn't going to be that team. They have shamefully given up and are not giving their fans their money's worth if last week's performance is any indication. BUT the Chargers WILL give them a good game, so there IS still a legit chance for it to happen.


OK read, react, and respond and above all, enjoy this highly enjoyable win before the injury reports start leaking out.
Thank you as always Ken. I have summoned up the 2025 Patriots as a good team, flawed but able to win in spite.

To be in the current position that they currently are with a unfinished roster led by an elite young QB wich top notch coaching is beyond impressive.

On offense they are fluent, well coached and efficient and can hit big pass plays.

On defense they tend to give up plays here and there and we know about the red zone.. however with the missing guys on defense they are going to have slippage.

Lots of teams thst are currently eliminated would love to be in thier position. The trajectory regardless of what happens in the postseason is pointing upwards for the organization.
 
IMO we’re good enough to get to the SB if healthy, cause we’re not very deep. We especially need Milt Williams and Spillane back, which should happen. Our offense is dope, the d is good enough with our guys back.

As far as the refs, the fact that the league doesn’t have a mechanism to correct that missed PI says it all. Just give one of the tv announcers a buzzer to signal the ref and the problem is fixed. It’s NOT the refs on the field, cause anything can be missed. It’s the lack of an overseer that can correct any call or missed call.
 
You are right, that particular play is hard to explain OR defend as a matter of opinion. That's why BBs challenge rule makes such good sense. You see your DE strangled on a rush you can can throw the flag. BUT you only get to do it a very limited amount of times. So you can't do it every time you see something and the game doesn't slow down.
I disagree on that. You get to do it as many times as you get it right. After two challenges fail you get no more.

If the concern is slowing the game down the zebras and the expedited replay crew need to get the calls right. If they do there won’t be an inordinate number of challenges and the game won’t be slowed.

Also, challenge results should be used to evaluate officials. If they get too many challenges upheld they get penalized, or if they’re really bad they get fired. And publish their report cards.
 
As far as the refs, the fact that the league doesn’t have a mechanism to correct that missed PI says it all. Just give one of the tv announcers a buzzer to signal the ref and the problem is fixed. It’s NOT the refs on the field, cause anything can be missed. It’s the lack of an overseer that can correct any call or missed call.
Yes, it is weird that NY replay command center can't fix non-calls. Or something. If the point of the God's eye view in New York is to fix egregious errors, it seems they should revisit things like this in the off-season. There are so many arbitrary meta-rules it's just freaking bizarre. If the goal is to make the product better and the rulings more accurate (and only allow them if it doesn't significantly disrupt the flow of the game yadda yadda), it seems a no-brainer.

I mean....somehow the call in that freakish 2-point conversion in the Bears game was fixed. But not this? I know that was a scoring play, but the level of subtlety between the two is night and day. FFS.
 
Yes, it is weird that NY replay command center can't fix non-calls. Or something. If the point of the God's eye view in New York is to fix egregious errors, it seems they should revisit things like this in the off-season. There are so many arbitrary meta-rules it's just freaking bizarre. If the goal is to make the product better and the rulings more accurate (and only allow them if it doesn't significantly disrupt the flow of the game yadda yadda), it seems a no-brainer.

I mean....somehow the call in that freakish 2-point conversion in the Bears game was fixed. But not this? I know that was a scoring play, but the level of subtlety between the two is night and day. FFS.
You ask too much of the Billionaire Boy's Club.

Remember dis:


The proposal did not pass, but was rather tabled. Giants owner John Mara, in an interview with Newsday, cited cost as concern with Belichick's proposal.
 
I would take all instant replay out of all sports and just live with human error. There's nothing more annoying and boring than watching a dozen replays for 10 minutes. With gambling, I recognize it won't happen...
 
Im fairly anti-DEI myself (yes, just another old guy [JAOG]), but I don’t see that as main problem.

The main problem is one of two things, and I’m not sure which it is in any particular game:
1. You can’t tell me Vegas or ‚somebody w a betting interest‘ doesn’t have an interest in some of these games and isn’t using whatever leverage they may have. The basketball issues this past year tell me it has to be there in nfl and other sports too.

2. The NYJFL under GoToHell has shown since SB XL (40) postseason in 2005 that they have no reluctance in steering outcomes.
Roger the dodger has issued numerous „ points of emphasis“ over the years that essentially created new rules, or muddied the waters enough that national announcers have to say „we‘ll have to wait and see what they rule, because we can’t tell what the rules are anymore.“.
Initially the emphasis I think was on making the product „ more watchable, by a larger audience“.. hence in 2005, the registers favored Paymeaton until he **** the bed & they switched favoritism to Rapistburger. GotoHell wanted a popular face for the league.

Then, like the bogus safety call in the Gints SB, I think it was more about trying to keep a competitive balance in a particular game. I firmly believe that same NE play in 3Q would have been ho-hum, nothing. But they were worried Pats would blow out Gints, so they figured the 5 points (2+3 fog) at beginning would keep it competitive, not determine the outcome.

Over the years this constant hand on the ref tiller has given the impression it is ok to adjust the rules for your own reasons & not just the Ommissioner’s or that there are no rules but what we want today.

I am confident there is at least one set of refs firmly in GotoHell‘s pocket & taking direction. The calls in our Jill’s game in particular & a couple others seem oriented around ensuring game 17 relevance to playoffs & keeping viewers in front of screens rather than on the events on the field of play. The calls vs Ratbirds were so egregious that I don’t know what to think.. thank god justice was served.
No one ever mentions that bogus grounding call against Brady in the SB, but I agree it was a bad, and huge call.

Cost the Pats 2 points and the ball.

And there is the clear fumble recovery by the Pats that was taken from them.

Remember that the Pats had already been threatened with a congressional investigation over the Spygate farce two days before they attempted to complete a perfect season.

How about no holding called against Seymour on the helmet catch play?

The league couldn’t have tried any harder to ensure the Pats didn’t win.
 
I would take all instant replay out of all sports and just live with human error. There's nothing more annoying and boring than watching a dozen replays for 10 minutes. With gambling, I recognize it won't happen...

Disagree completely. There is way too much on the line for bad calls and no calls to be allowed, and sports should ensure that egregious " mistakes" aren't allowed to stand.
 
Disagree completely. There is way too much on the line for bad calls and no calls to be allowed, and sports should ensure that egregious " mistakes" aren't allowed to stand.
We want the rules to be followed correctly, and refs are humans and make mistakes. Unlike some, I don't see ref mistakes as "part of the game" (that is, I agree with you). They are not actually part of the game, they are there to oversee the actual game, not to be in the game. If they mess up, we should correct it (if it doesn't cause ridiculous delays). We have the tech. It isn't 1970 anymore. Some rules about what can be overrulled (e.g., non-calls) seem silly and arbitrary. It is, and should be, constantly evolving.
 
No one ever mentions that bogus grounding call against Brady in the SB, but I agree it was a bad, and huge call.

Cost the Pats 2 points and the ball.

And there is the clear fumble recovery by the Pats that was taken from them.

Remember that the Pats had already been threatened with a congressional investigation over the Spygate farce two days before they attempted to complete a perfect season.

How about no holding called against Seymour on the helmet catch play?

The league couldn’t have tried any harder to ensure the Pats didn’t win.
100%, with all.
justice bold part, I count it as a 5-pt swing/play cause IIRC they drove enough to get a FG after the free kick.
 
100%, with all.
justice bold part, I count it as a 5-pt swing/play cause IIRC they drove enough to get a FG after the free kick.
There were no receivers in the middle of the field. Stop making excuses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Back
Top