- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 43,430
- Reaction score
- 21,618
we have games coming up against 5 of the bottom six
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.We aren't "full throttle" with White replacing Landry.Great to see Keion White as a full participant this week. The pass rush needs to get back to full throttle and in synch to keep the train rolling down the tracks. Now they're defending 1st place in the division and there's no reason to let some QB have a big game that could derail this.
I love stadiums that are built into a downtown area. It gives the area and the stadium so much more character, in my opinion.Yeah, it didn’t knock my socks off either from the outside but I think the inside is going to be very nice. It’s right next to downtown and a pedestrian bridge away from broadway. In that way it beats foxboro to me. Every time I think about going up to foxboro, it’s kind of a pain to get too. This is easy, so they have that going for them. I’ll enjoy watching the Pats come down here and whipping ass though.
I love stadiums that are built into a downtown area. It gives the area and the stadium so much more character, in my opinion.
As my best friend told me circa a Denny's in 1987 "it's not the face you F&^%, its the F&^% you face."And in the dark, a hole's a hole...
- Michael Donovan
35-69 straight up, and 46-55-3 against the spread. Straight up is irrelevant because it doesn't take into account the two teams playing. Removing the ties, IN 101 games you'd expect 50.5 to cover, 46 of them did. 9% less is the difference. It's only like 4-5 games out of 100 away from being completely meaningless.According to OddsShark, Over the last 10 years: 35–69 (~ 33.7 %).But that doesn't affect whether the three-game road trip effect is a major or a minor factor. The data says "major".
35-69 straight up, and 46-55-3 against the spread. Straight up is irrelevant because it doesn't take into account the two teams playing. Removing the ties, IN 101 games you'd expect 50.5 to cover, 46 of them did. 9% less is the difference. It's only like 4-5 games out of 100 away from being completely meaningless.
Patriots are favored by 7 and have a 45% chance of covering the spread based on history.
The BIG issue is the sample size is tiny, there are 272 games in a season and over a decade we only have around 100 games to sample, not even half a season worth of data.
PLUS there are so many questions on the data set: how did teams fare that WON the first 2 road games? How did home teams fare that were ranked 30-32 in all power rankings and DVOA? Could go on and on. Patriots rank 11 in Offense DVOA and Titans 32. Since offense has shown to be more likely to result in wins, which of the historical teams had a huge edge in offense and still lost?
To compare this data to the Patriots and Titans you need to adjust the sample size and may find there are only 10 games that apply to this particular scenario? Maybe? Hard to tell but already the sample size is too small and now you need to make it smaller.
It's just not meaningful and the only data that could account for some of this, though not all of it, is against the spread. And it's about a 9% edge to the home team. An advantage but seems pretty small.
As well as #1, #5 and #10, but they already beat #4 and #7.we have games coming up against 5 of the bottom six
As my best friend told me circa a Denny's in 1987 "it's not the face you F&^%, its the F&^% you face."
So I was at an event yesterday at Gillette stadium where many different vendors in MA/NE had booths on the club level of Gillette Stadium. At one point a Gillette employee came and yelled out "everyone put your phones away, no pictures".
The team came out and did their walkthrough practice for an hour. It was no pads. Obviously everyone was watching.
Funniest thing was, Vrabel literally took every single snap at linebacker for like a half hour.
Dang, they think they need inside information just to beat the Titans.
(I think that’s a joke. He was oddly signed to the active roster last week despite being inactive, which meant getting him back to the PS required allowing other teams to recruit him to their PS instead.)
That's true. I just like the way they look from the highway and airplanes.True on game day, but the rest of the time in many cases they are like giant mausoleums right in the middle of a city.
Some teams do a good job of building in a "fan experience" area with shops etc so it's not so dead when there is no game to be played.
Other teams don't bother and IMO that sucks.
There's no universe where they should have lost the game there last year. Complete coach mismanagement.Our QB would also like to set things straight down there I'm fairly certain, his end-of-regulation heroics notwithstanding.
There's no universe where they should have lost the game there last year. Complete coach mismanagement.
Ummm Keion White is like standing on the brake and then putting on the E brake. I hope white figures it out, but right now I will take Chaisson every day and the entire game on Sundays.Great to see Keion White as a full participant this week. The pass rush needs to get back to full throttle and in synch to keep the train rolling down the tracks. Now they're defending 1st place in the division and there's no reason to let some QB have a big game that could derail this.
| 19 | 1K |
| 47 | 4K |
| 8 | 615 |
| 7 | 263 |
| 6 | 459 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











