- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 43,483
- Reaction score
- 21,665
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.“Well enough” definitely isn’t the word I’d use to describe the performance. They gave up big play after big play including back breaking ones.The Defense played well enough to win and will get better as the season progresses.
The Defense played well enough to win and will get better as the season progresses.
Pass defense was like Swiss cheese.The defense was ok against the Raiders. Stamina was an issue but that will improve. Gonzo would have helped for sure.
Pass defense was like Swiss cheese.
Run defense did not let Jeanty have much.
How can that be?Even apart from the first drive and his touchdown, he was turning 2 or 3 yard runs into 4 or 5 yard ones, which makes all of the difference. To be fair, the backups were much less successful, which suggests it was the attacker rather than the defenders who were responsible. Still, I think he gave the Raiders an important advantage.
Bruh. He had 19 carries for 38 yards. He had one run over 5 yards.Even apart from the first drive and his touchdown, he was turning 2 or 3 yard runs into 4 or 5 yard ones, which makes all of the difference. To be fair, the backups were much less successful, which suggests it was the attacker rather than the defenders who were responsible. Still, I think he gave the Raiders an important advantage.
17-20 is a a pipe dream. The #1 scoring defense in the NFL last year allowed 17.7. 20 a game wood have ranked 8th.We have a very different Defense. I expect to see an attacking Defense that has lots of pressure, lots of sacks, one that gives up many more big plays, more interceptions and gives up 17-20 points a game.
The Defense played well enough to win and will get better as the season progresses.
I guess you're correct. They didn't pitch a shutout. They allowed 20 points. They shouldn't allow 10, given our Offense.“Well enough” definitely isn’t the word I’d use to describe the performance. They gave up big play after big play including back breaking ones.
Isn't this a fact free zone?Bruh. He had 19 carries for 38 yards. He had one run over 5 yards.
You watched a different game than the rest of us..but the Raiders were more successful running the ball than the Patriots, thanks to Ashton Jeanty, who constantly broke through tackles and made yards after contact.
You watched a different game than the rest of us.
You're correct. Lots of coaches and fans do NOT prefer an attacking Defense.I don't know about this hyped "attacking D"... everyone attacks. BB had great pass rushing, and cover schemes... really, the best the NFL had seen early 2000's (just ask Manning).
But, what concerns me - is the apparent blind spot in this scheme - which is to blitz on 3rd & 20, while giving up 25yds.
You can be aggressive & physically dominant, without pinning ears back every down and leaving passing zones widely exposed.
You watched a different game than the rest of us.
I think you just whiffed from literally every angleEven apart from the first drive and his touchdown, he was turning 2 or 3 yard runs into 4 or 5 yard ones, which makes all of the difference. To be fair, the backups were much less successful, which suggests it was the attacker rather than the defenders who were responsible. Still, I think he gave the Raiders an important advantage.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 6 - April 21 (Through 26yrs)











