- Joined
- Dec 20, 2009
- Messages
- 6,182
- Reaction score
- 9,220
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Bumping this thread because it’s a good topic. I think in general we could use depth at all positions across the board, not just some. We have some decent front line talent — even really good at some positions like CB — but if any of those guys get hurt, the drop off can be steep.Cut downs are near at hand. What are our positional weaknesses and which team have an abundance of riches in those areas that might have to be pared and placed on waivers? We get to pick fourth in the waivers process.
Cut downs are near at hand. What are our positional weaknesses and which team have an abundance of riches in those areas that might have to be pared and placed on waivers? We get to pick fourth in the waivers process.
A weak roster that needs to be cut down. A strong roster that needs to be cut down. I would think those released from the latter would be stronger than the marginal ones who survive the initial cuts in the former.For a specific position where the cupboard is bare, if we want to use the FB we can stand some major improvement. But how many teams use them and will cut guys better than what we have now?
ONE of these is a lot to ask at this time of year.Left Guard
Center
Backup QB
RB #4
FB
TE #3
That's a lot to ask for at this time of the year, but that's the state of a rebuilding team.
Haven't focused on any other teams enough to know who might be waived that would provide this team with an upgrade.
But the good team gets to keep 55 players. The stronger team is stronger because players 1-55 are stronger than the weaker team. There are exceptions mostly from a team having an excess at a certain position, but overall the talent level of players 55-90 is not much different from a good team compared to a bad team. They mostly are prospects in need of development to be solid contributors.A weak roster that needs to be cut down. A strong roster that needs to be cut down. I would think those released from the latter would be stronger than the marginal ones who survive the initial cuts in the former.
Anything with the word 'Backup' before the position.Cut downs are near at hand. What are our positional weaknesses and which team have an abundance of riches in those areas that might have to be pared and placed on waivers? We get to pick fourth in the waivers process.
And they say you can't learn anything from the last preseason game.Still a long way to go rebuilding this roster.
I watched Sidy Sow get absolutely turned around at least 4 times and rag dolled.And they say you can't learn anything from the last preseason game.
You shouldve FF the game and watched the commercialsJust watched the game…FF through the commercials and halftime was nice.
Man…I gotta say Bedard is spot on.
We have no depth.
Our second string is too full of bad football players.
Probably too much to ask, but I deadass think the Pats should replace 7-10 players who initial make it with cuts from other teams. It’s that bad.
Also, I’m not sure we have a backup QB at all.
Dobbs has been awful and wooldridge is a less talented Zappe with the batted balls.
O-line backups are atrocious.
Still a long way to go rebuilding this roster.
Why didn’t I think of thatYou shouldve FF the game and watched the commercials
You did miss some prime Amazon Arc Al Michaels though. Him ****ting on Ryan Fitzpatrick's career sitting right next to him for a good half hour was must-see.Why didn’t I think of that
???This last preseason game has reinforced my opinion that the Pats will be active on the waiver wire.
Definitely awkward.You did miss some prime Amazon Arc Al Michaels though. Him ****ting on Ryan Fitzpatrick's career sitting right next to him for a good half hour was must-see.
Especially with Herbstreit right there on the other side, who didn't even get a cup of coffee in the NFL, must have been thinking 'Holy **** this guy was in the league 17 years'.Definitely awkward.
| 33 | 3K |
| 7 | 3K |
| 10 | 2K |
| 11 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











