The Bill megathread (HC at UNC, girlfriend, etc.)

[maust]

Good. Now add 2 + 6. Then tell me what's more 8 or 7?

 

[Bill Lee]

You apparently have no clue how to do fair statistically analysis. If you want to remove a large data set from one it's only fair to do a similar curve for anyone else who you want to compare. So like I said if you want to subtract 20 years of Bill without his best QB you should do the same for anyone else who you want to compare him too.

Ok, then how do we subtract 20 years of TFB being coached by BB's organization from his career?

Suppose the Patriots don't draft him, and he goes as a UDFA to a ****bag team like da Jete.

How does that turn out?

Let's just stop.

Both BB and TB praise each other to the high hills.

You can make a good case that either would suck without the other.

Fact is, they did have each other, and we got The Dynasty because of it.

Can't we all just ****ing be happy that it did happen, instead of making up scenarios where it didn't?

 

[Froob]

Ok, then how do we subtract 20 years of TFB being coached by BB's organization from his career?

Suppose the Patriots don't draft him, and he goes as a UDFA to a ****bag team like da Jete.

How does that turn out?

Let's just stop.

Both BB and TB praise each other to the high hills.

You can make a good case that either would suck without the other.

Fact is, they did have each other, and we got The Dynasty because of it.

Can't we all just ****ing be happy that it did happen, instead of making up scenarios where it didn't?

no

 

[signbabybrady]

 

[signbabybrady]

Ok, then how do we subtract 20 years of TFB being coached by BB's organization from his career?

Suppose the Patriots don't draft him, and he goes as a UDFA to a ****bag team like da Jete.

How does that turn out?

Let's just stop.

Both BB and TB praise each other to the high hills.

You can make a good case that either would suck without the other.

Fact is, they did have each other, and we got The Dynasty because of it.

Can't we all just ****ing be happy that it did happen, instead of making up scenarios where it didn't?

That's exactly my point. You can't even subtract 20 years from most coaches they'd be 0-0. They have to twist that pretzel just to make their case. I've apologized many times but I'm not letting that kind of dishonesty go unchecked.

 

[XLIX]

You apparently have no clue how to do fair statistically analysis. If you want to remove a large data set from one it's only fair to do a similar curve for anyone else who you want to compare. So like I said if you want to subtract 20 years of Bill without his best QB you should do the same for anyone else who you want to compare him too.

Here is the flaw in the above:

My thesis is that Bill Belichick without Tom Brady is no better of a HC than Jeff Fisher or Rex Ryan. As such, the logical statistical comparison is Bill Belichick without Tom Brady to the entire careers of Jeff Fisher or Rex Ryan.

You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. Stop humiliating yourself.

 

[XLIX]

So he won zero SBs got it.

You know, they play other games besides Super Bowls.

When 1 HC has 11 playoff wins and the other HC has 1, we can draw logical conclusions from that even if there are no Super Bowl championships in there for either guy.

 

[XLIX]

You can make a good case that either would suck without the other.

You can't really make that case about Brady considering he has 5 playoff wins, one of which was a Super Bowl, in 3 years without Belichick.

 

[signbabybrady]

You know, they play other games besides Super Bowls.

When 1 HC has 11 playoff wins and the other HC has 1, we can draw logical conclusions from that even if there are no Super Bowl championships in there for either guy.

If you don't understand how dishonest it is to subtract the 20 best years of someones career and compare that to someone else's entire career then you're dumber than I thought.

Rex doesn't think he's a better coach than Bill so you can just stop with your terrible math.

 

[signbabybrady]

You can't really make that case about Brady considering he has 5 playoff wins, one of which was a Super Bowl, in 3 years without Belichick.

Bill had already coached him for twenty years and already turned him into that player.

 

[JayNM]

If you have a problem with me discussing this topic, feel free to use the mute button. It looks like this:

Im doing this for you my dude, trust

i will keep reading, thank you very much for the info-feature

 

[The Gr8est]

I'm rooting for him.

You want the Raiders to won a SB?

I’d prefer that Bob Kraft fixes his error of omission and let Brady become a minority owner with the Pats.

 

[signbabybrady]

You want the Raiders to won a SB?

I’d prefer that Bob Kraft fixes his error of omission and let Brady become a minority owner with the Pats.

I will root for Tom and the Raiders so long as it's not at our expense.

 

[The Gr8est]

Ok, then how do we subtract 20 years of TFB being coached by BB's organization from his career?

Suppose the Patriots don't draft him, and he goes as a UDFA to a ****bag team like da Jete.

How does that turn out?

Let's just stop.

Both BB and TB praise each other to the high hills.

You can make a good case that either would suck without the other.

Fact is, they did have each other, and we got The Dynasty because of it.

Can't we all just ****ing be happy that it did happen, instead of making up scenarios where it didn't?

If Brady got drafted by the Rats they would have released him since he was a late round pick, and some other team would have scooped him up.

The Pats got Danny Woodhead because the Rats chose to keep their 3rd round pick, who wasn’t as good as Woodhead.

 

[XLIX]

If you don't understand how dishonest it is to subtract the 20 best years of someones career and compare that to someone else's entire career then you're dumber than I thought.

When the whole argument is Belichick-without-Brady, then yeah it makes perfect sense to take away the Brady years.

Rex doesn't think he's a better coach than Bill so you can just stop with your terrible math.

I never said Rex was a better coach than Belichick. What I said was Rex is statistically better than Belichick-without-Brady.

Which he is.

 

[XLIX]

Im doing this for you my dude, trust

If you can point out one factually inaccurate statement I have made in this side-topic, I will stop posting on the side-topic.

i will keep reading,

Good. Maybe you'll even learn something.

 

[signbabybrady]

When the whole argument is Belichick-without-Brady, then yeah it makes perfect sense to take away the Brady years.

I never said Rex was a better coach than Belichick. What I said was Rex is statistically better than Belichick-without-Brady.

Which he is.

Do you have a point then or just trolling?

 

[XLIX]

Do you have a point then or just trolling?

What part of:

My thesis is that Bill Belichick without Tom Brady is no better of a HC than Jeff Fisher or Rex Ryan

do you not understand?

(And if I am trolling then what does it say about you considering you respond to each and every single post I make?)

 

[signbabybrady]

If you can point out one factually inaccurate statement I have made in this side-topic, I will stop posting on the side-topic.

Bill Belichick has more SB rings than anyone else. You can't point out anything factually inaccurate with my statement either.

 

[signbabybrady]

What part of:

My thesis is that Bill Belichick without Tom Brady is no better of a HC than Jeff Fisher or Rex Ryan

do you not understand?

(And if I am trolling then what does it say about you considering you respond to each and every single post I make?)

I understand and I reject it entirely.

It says I don't like trolls.