- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 35,632
- Reaction score
- 27,758
Mason Taylor Round 3.Do we have a good blocking TE on the roster?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Mason Taylor Round 3.Do we have a good blocking TE on the roster?
I really would ask that I be spared these asinine video clips. Be an adult, Use your words.
Isn’t Lockett washed? Diggs is better, even with the ACL. If he doesn’t work out, you pay the guaranteed money and say goodbye.
Wouldn’t JM know about Diggs’ attitude since his brother is the Texans’ WR coach?
He's recruiting.Why Highsmith?
Agree 100%, you can’t deny the 2nd year jump. He was good with the Pat’s last year.Yeah, could go either way. I don't think Boutte struggled with BOB's offense as much as he just was not put on the field by Bill. With having taken a step forward last year and now having more help around him, he could come a solid player who rotates in on the other side of Diggs.
They are childish. They are asinine. They are an alternative to actual thought followed by actual expression. Perhaps your post demonstrates the dismal results when those who suffer from a need for such crutches attempt to express themselves in an adult manner, using words. It might indeed be best for you to stick to posting pictures. As for your adolescent compulsion to "push the buttons" of those who do not share your limitations, that is an embarrassment you would do well to overcome.
While i definitely love the sentiment, Locket and Diggs would just be redundant, as they don't have that killer speed no more - Diggs might, but coming off an ACL we can be iffy, at least on the first year. Boutte could be impacted with both of them here, and it's alway nice to be reminded that he is 22 still, so super young.
Lockett. Keenan Allen.While i definitely love the sentiment, Locket and Diggs would just be redundant, as they don't have that killer speed no more - Diggs might, but coming off an ACL we can be iffy, at least on the first year. Boutte could be impacted with both of them here, and it's alway nice to be reminded that he is 22 still, so super young.
Personally, I've always liked Elijah Moore who is on the market (based on my very few sighting of Cleveland lol). Slot guy, could be a nice challange for Douglas and/or substitute, or better yet, a Bourne substitute, cheaper and younger.
but also we might need the space for 1 high-ish round rookie im willing to bet we'll get in the draft
Now I think Diggs is slowing down even before this, but this is a good argument for him being a 1,000 plus yard WR again.
Predictable. Best of luck in middle school next year.
If they get another "hight-tier" WR then I'm agreeing with youLockett. Keenan Allen.
They're backstopping against Hunter going before four.
Predictable. Best of luck in middle school next year.
Both Allen and Lockett are hitting the dreaded age of 33 for WR's.Lockett. Keenan Allen.
They're backstopping against Hunter going before four.
They're taking Hunter if he's there.If they get another "hight-tier" WR then I'm agreeing with you
best case scenario is that these players (+ Aijuk? Who knows) are available during the draft, then if Hunter is not on play at #4, we don't necessarily need to be aggressive for another WR that the staff doesnt love
I am a fan. You seem to have this need to share your premature ejaculations on here so please grab some tissues and clean up your post.No I want your expertise. Unless you believe only 4 WR should be on the roster? How dare me! Putting 7 WR'S up..
I like Allen for his size, could be nice to have him in the redzone mostly, as we don't have anyone similar. If he is a willing blocker (idk), even betterBoth Allen and Lockett are hitting the dreaded age of 33 for WR's.
I think it's Hunter at #4 or Higgins at #38.They're taking Hunter if he's there.
They will be drafting a WR regardless.
Thats Vrabel.He's recruiting.
If we end up paying Diggs those 69M that means he was freaking good for us. And those 23M/y for a good WR were worth itThe “ 23” million per year sounds high, but only 26 of the 69 million of it is guaranteed, which makes it a really good deal, as he will have to earn most of it.
| 32 | 2K |
| 20 | 905 |
| 87 | 11K |
| 67 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











