dex13
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2010
- Messages
- 546
- Reaction score
- 199
He's very good at RT....but is just better at RG. And tackles are still paid more.Why would Onwenu move outside to a position he's not as good at?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He's very good at RT....but is just better at RG. And tackles are still paid more.Why would Onwenu move outside to a position he's not as good at?
Good ones cost. Since we don't have Scar anymore, the days of getting quality play from bargain basement signing are ova.19m per year feels a bit steep for a right tackle. But let's be real we desperately needed a solid offensive lineman to build around.
Hopefully we also find an LT soon.
Can't agree more. All those years Matt Light was a very "solid" starting LT, I believed he'd have been a perennial all pro LG had he'd have been given a chance. Same goes for Owenu. In an ideal world 2 great OT's fall into the Pats lap and Mike goes back to RG and Sow and Strange can fight it out for the LG job.He's very good at RT....but is just better at RG. And tackles are still paid more.
Many said Onwenu was terrible @ RT but what do I know. Guess they didn't see that Turnstyle V Lowe play arrow to the QB. .Can't agree more. All those years Matt Light was a very "solid" starting LT, I believed he'd have been a perennial all pro LG had he'd have been given a chance. Same goes for Owenu. In an ideal world 2 great OT's fall into the Pats lap and Mike goes back to RG and Sow and Strange can fight it out for the LG job.
Or even better, as I mentioned LAST season and several have mentioned since, move the uber althletic Strange to LT and have an OL of Strange Sow, Andrews, Owenu and some FA or draftee that winds up being at LEAST a solid NFL starter. Actually now that I see it, I'd sign up for that right now. That wouldn't be a great OL from the get go, but COULD develop into one by the end of the year.
BUT if Mike winds up being the RT this season I'd be fine with that. He had very good PFF stats at that position
If he was so terrible as so many glib poster just casually announce, then why was his market so hot. Why was he ranked in the top 20 of available FA's (17 IIRC) and why had so many made him the second T on the board after, I think, TSmith. (whom I would LOVE to see the Pats sign despite all the past injury concerns. Sometimes you have get lucky, like the C's Porzingas....so far.Many said Onwenu was terrible @ RT but what do I know. Guess they didn't see that Turnstyle V Lowe play arrow to the QB..
Or even better, as I mentioned LAST season and several have mentioned since, move the uber althletic Strange to LT and have an OL of Strange Sow, Andrews, Owenu and some FA or draftee that winds up being at LEAST a solid NFL starter.
Can we get confirmation from the Pats that Onwenu will indeed be moved to RT?
We drafted Jake Andrews to be David A's replacement, and Andrews looked really good when he played LG last year.Fine, play him at RT for now. Probably make the most sense for this roster where Strange/Sow are both young and good enough to play at the guard spots.
I still hope that next year we transition Strange inside to C to replace Andrews (I presume he'll retire), Sow can go back to his college position of LG. Onwenu can settle in at RG where he can be a pro bowler as opposed to just good at RT.
Yeah, he did look good when he played. But they chose to start Sow and Strange over him still so as of right now they seem to think those are better options. So I'm just assuming that in a scenario where Onwenu is moved back to RG and replaced by a more natural RT and provided that Strange can transition effectively to Center, that Jake Andrews would still be behind those guys. Which would make him a good depth option, which is always welcome.We drafted Jake Andrews to be David A's replacement, and Andrews looked really good when he played LG last year.
Resurrecting this thread. ESPN interviewed execs where they vote on top 10 G's in the NFL and Owenu didn't make the cut. He was paid within a top 5 for T's in the NFL where execs view him more as a G and/or combo T/G. This is a bad contract and the Pats overpaid.
He's not ranked in the top 10 among NFL execs?This article isn' really saying anything of merit about his play. It doesn't suggest they overpaid, it mainly says "he's a great player. he didn't make it into the guard rankings from some random exec survey. it probably doesn't help that he was on a bad offense. they also see him as a combo."
I'm failing to understand how this translates to a bad signing.
Resurrecting this thread. ESPN interviewed execs where they vote on top 10 G's in the NFL and Owenu didn't make the cut. He was paid within a top 5 for T's in the NFL where execs view him more as a G and/or combo T/G. This is a bad contract and the Pats overpaid.
Andrews is the backup center and emergency backup guard.re Jake Andrews, not only did an injured Strange and Sow get the nod ahead of him, so did Mafi.
I can't see where his contract stacked up at the time (I think it was near the top), but it's another example of how signing a player prematurely can cause you to lose a better player not far down the road like Thuney.Yep; not nearly as stupid as the Uncle Dugg re-sign, but still…
It’s also not as bad as the Shack Mason extension; that one was ****ing Awful for a couple of reasons…
| 11 | 473 |
| 13 | 665 |
| 28 | 929 |
| 7 | 3K |
| 7 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











