- Joined
- Mar 11, 2014
- Messages
- 5,987
- Reaction score
- 7,409
Great post and perspective, as usual RWExactly. It's how it's taught and implemented.
The argument is E/P is too hard and you need smart/experienced receivers to run it.
Back in the Steeler Roeth days they ran E/P and seemed to land decent WRs on a consistent basis and scored a bunch of points. No one ever accused Roeth, Santonio Holmes, Hines Ward or Brown as being high IQ football players.
I think Tom raised the level of complexity so they needed to be choosy with the type of offensive players they brought in here.
Once Tom left, in the effort to expand potential WR fits, they scaled back the playbook but clearly haven't figured out to to score points and are poor at finding consistently producing receivers not named Meyers.
Let me go one step further, then maybe merging the how and why the EP seems to be flustering.
All that you pointed show to one thing in common, in my mind. It might shock you: Study
From what I know about the E/P, it requires a lot of mental effort, knowing the ifs and whiches of any given moment right? Your points indicate me so.
I sincerely doubt the attention span of the younger generation helps with the amount of study that goes through learning the EP system, AFAIK. and if you allow me a slight deviation, - where Brady fits into this - actually simple: If he does it (study this much), I should do it. They've lost the example. It's huge.
So, back on track, if indeed there is generational systematic problem with EP, it goes back to what said. It's outdated. And the how might go deeper than one or two (or three or four) coaches. Why? EP requires study. How? To make the amount of study that it requires.
As many simple questions in life... Look easy. Aren't.
(And with everything that I think of BB, that is why I am so doubtful of him being able to understand this and simply change)












