- Joined
- Apr 3, 2006
- Messages
- 26,101
- Reaction score
- 52,115
Okay, so let's just start with this: I believe the better, and more worthy team, won both games. The Bucs were extremely lucky to even be in the game with FOUR fumble recoveries. The Chiefs are just one of those teams that always seems to find a way. But the games were marred in my opinion. Not the results, but the actual officiating processes and rules were a goddamned disaster once again. All year, I've made the same points over and over again, whether the Patriots, Bucs, or some other teams were playing:
1. After an entire season of watching stupid taunting penalties decide games, the player who was a main reason for the rule, Tyreek Hill, blatantly taunts in front of everyone, but the refs decide that isn't taunting, due to their arbitrary standards.
Tyreek Hill's "deuces" sign was arguably the biggest impetus for the rule. After Hill got leveled in SB55, Antoine Winfield, Jr. gave him the deuces and got a 15-yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct. The competition committee then passed the rule. If you Google the taunting rule, an actual photo of either Hill or Winfield is often displayed as the example, with headlines sometimes saying things like "no more deuces." Now, all year I've *****ed and moaned that taunting won't be enforced fairly because sometimes refs will just take the attitude of "oh chill, man, it's fun" and other times will blow the whistle which can be extremely costly.
So with a minute left in the AFCDG, Tyreek Hill takes off for the endzone and he's going to make it. This is a guy who has been warned repeatedly about the deuces. The entire league knows about it, and that it's now illegal. And what does he do? He does, apparently, the exact type of defiance, from a repeat offender, who would have zero surprise that his transgression will result in a penalty. And the refs do nothing. Nothing.
You've gotta be kidding me. All year, we've heard, "letter of the law" and been told taunting is serious business and it's important to enforce the rule every time. By the way (as you'll see from the Mike Evans example), the penalty should have happened during the play and not after it. A taunting penalty should have backed the Chiefs up to the 30 yard line.
2. After the officials failed to call a blatant, textbook penalty on Von Miller against Tom Brady, Brady lost his ****...but Shawn Hochuli was bigger than the game and swearing is serious business, so Brady got a 15 yard penalty.
Shawn Hochuli is a ****sucker. We all know this. After the game, he claimed that the hit "didn't rise to the level of roughing the passer" despite blood literally being drawn on an automatic helmet to helmet penalty. In fact, it arguably violated three penalties: hitting the quarterback in helmet at all, helmet to helmet, and roughing the passer.
Now again, refs miss calls. That's going to happen. But, why the hell shouldn't this play be reviewable? A 15-yard penalty is huge in the NFL. Instead, Hochuli gave Brady the 15-yard personal foul in what, I really hope, was worth it and I hope we'll one day hear about the specific wordage Brady hurled at him. I'm not excusing Brady because he should have kept his cool, but again, look at the crappy rules/process here. A major, game changing penalty that's supposed to be black and white gets doesn't get called; the team has no recourse; and then, the official just can't let it go when a player loses it.
The result was a 30-yard swing. The Bucs did get a first down but missed the field goal due to that major field position swing.
3. Matthew Stafford blatantly kicks Nkamondong Suh in the balls. Suh gets a 15 yard penalty for "language" or something.
Here we go again with this officiating crew. Forget who Suh is...I get it...he's a dirty player. But NFL rules aren't supposed to base calls on a player's past, are they? Now, just simply watch the play taking the actual player name out of it. What do you see?
Yep...Stafford gave Suh a cheap shot. And you know what? **** happens. But then, after Suh said something back, he got hit with a 15 yard penalty. **** happens back. Once again, the penalty is game changing, and if the correct call had actually been made, it's another 30-yard swing.
4. Mike Evans gets a vicious helmet to helmet hit, but a technicality means the Bucs don't keep possession.
I'm not going to argue with the application of this rule, but it's clearly a stupid rule and needs to be fixed. On fourth down, Evans was targeted down the leftt sideline and was subject to a blatant, illegal hit. Now, it was incredibly obvious that the hit was part of the play. On a roughing the passer call, the team with the ball would retain possession regardless of where the ball landed or when it landed. However, since the ball technically hit the ground first, the Rams got the ball back and the 15 yard penalty was assessed. I would even argue that the illegal act of launching began before the ball hit the ground, even if the helmet wasn't actually hit yet.
Regardless, it seems like yet another stupid application of the rules.
SUGGESTIONS
I'm going to just keep beating this drum because it's getting so hard to watch these games:
1. If you must have a stupid taunting penalty, hedge the errors of applying it randomly, and make it less draconian. If taunting is really a concern, make it a 5 yard penalty and no automatic first down. In addition, give the player a warning, with the next one resulting in ejection. Problem solved, and the games will actually be decided by football and not refs incomplete understanding of the exchange and their ever changing sensitivity levels.
2. In addition, stop the 15 yard, automatic first down for any penalty that doesn't effect the game and doesn't pose a safety threat. Taunting has made all of this worse, but penalties are stupid in general with 15 yards awarded for things that don't actually have an impact on the game. The only 15 yard penalties should be for serious injury risk plays. A hand grazing a QB's helmet or a late push should be five yards; a blatant helmet to helmet should be 15 with the first down.
3. Make every play reviewable if the determination is based on a clear, unambiguous event. I don't think every play should be reviewable because the fact is, there's always going to be some intent-based calls, "know it when you see it" calls, context calls, etc. We saw how this was a disaster with the pass interference replay attempt. However, any play where the call is based on video evidence only should be reviewable. If a helmet to helmet hit occurs, it's a penalty and should be reviewable. If the defender hit the player's chest, it should be reversible. When a quarterback gets hit in the head, it's reviewable. When the defender actually didn't hit the head, it should be reversible. When a QB is out of bounds and gets hit, it should be a penalty. When the QB was not out of bounds first (like this year with Allen on the sidelines) a penalty should be reversible.
- Taunting Penalties are incredibly stupid because they're draconian, almost equaling a turnover in many cases, and mostly because the officials will never enforce them consistently, making the games even more random and based on bad calls. It's okay that bad calls happen for actual football plays, and that's hard enough to get right; now you're adding an impossible task of also interpreting dumbass trash talk that crosses an arbitrary line.
- QB helmet to helmet hits should be reviewable, since they're also equal to a turnover when they're called. These are huge penalties, and to enforce them arbitrarily is the same as awarding turnovers arbitrarily. Why not be able to review a helmet to helmet on a QB, considering it's an automatic penalty (black and white, intent is irrelevant.) There was a Bears-Ravens game this year that was an absolute clinic in ridiculously bad, inconsistent applications of this rule.
1. After an entire season of watching stupid taunting penalties decide games, the player who was a main reason for the rule, Tyreek Hill, blatantly taunts in front of everyone, but the refs decide that isn't taunting, due to their arbitrary standards.
Tyreek Hill's "deuces" sign was arguably the biggest impetus for the rule. After Hill got leveled in SB55, Antoine Winfield, Jr. gave him the deuces and got a 15-yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct. The competition committee then passed the rule. If you Google the taunting rule, an actual photo of either Hill or Winfield is often displayed as the example, with headlines sometimes saying things like "no more deuces." Now, all year I've *****ed and moaned that taunting won't be enforced fairly because sometimes refs will just take the attitude of "oh chill, man, it's fun" and other times will blow the whistle which can be extremely costly.
So with a minute left in the AFCDG, Tyreek Hill takes off for the endzone and he's going to make it. This is a guy who has been warned repeatedly about the deuces. The entire league knows about it, and that it's now illegal. And what does he do? He does, apparently, the exact type of defiance, from a repeat offender, who would have zero surprise that his transgression will result in a penalty. And the refs do nothing. Nothing.
You've gotta be kidding me. All year, we've heard, "letter of the law" and been told taunting is serious business and it's important to enforce the rule every time. By the way (as you'll see from the Mike Evans example), the penalty should have happened during the play and not after it. A taunting penalty should have backed the Chiefs up to the 30 yard line.
2. After the officials failed to call a blatant, textbook penalty on Von Miller against Tom Brady, Brady lost his ****...but Shawn Hochuli was bigger than the game and swearing is serious business, so Brady got a 15 yard penalty.
Shawn Hochuli is a ****sucker. We all know this. After the game, he claimed that the hit "didn't rise to the level of roughing the passer" despite blood literally being drawn on an automatic helmet to helmet penalty. In fact, it arguably violated three penalties: hitting the quarterback in helmet at all, helmet to helmet, and roughing the passer.
Now again, refs miss calls. That's going to happen. But, why the hell shouldn't this play be reviewable? A 15-yard penalty is huge in the NFL. Instead, Hochuli gave Brady the 15-yard personal foul in what, I really hope, was worth it and I hope we'll one day hear about the specific wordage Brady hurled at him. I'm not excusing Brady because he should have kept his cool, but again, look at the crappy rules/process here. A major, game changing penalty that's supposed to be black and white gets doesn't get called; the team has no recourse; and then, the official just can't let it go when a player loses it.
The result was a 30-yard swing. The Bucs did get a first down but missed the field goal due to that major field position swing.
3. Matthew Stafford blatantly kicks Nkamondong Suh in the balls. Suh gets a 15 yard penalty for "language" or something.
Here we go again with this officiating crew. Forget who Suh is...I get it...he's a dirty player. But NFL rules aren't supposed to base calls on a player's past, are they? Now, just simply watch the play taking the actual player name out of it. What do you see?
Yep...Stafford gave Suh a cheap shot. And you know what? **** happens. But then, after Suh said something back, he got hit with a 15 yard penalty. **** happens back. Once again, the penalty is game changing, and if the correct call had actually been made, it's another 30-yard swing.
4. Mike Evans gets a vicious helmet to helmet hit, but a technicality means the Bucs don't keep possession.
I'm not going to argue with the application of this rule, but it's clearly a stupid rule and needs to be fixed. On fourth down, Evans was targeted down the leftt sideline and was subject to a blatant, illegal hit. Now, it was incredibly obvious that the hit was part of the play. On a roughing the passer call, the team with the ball would retain possession regardless of where the ball landed or when it landed. However, since the ball technically hit the ground first, the Rams got the ball back and the 15 yard penalty was assessed. I would even argue that the illegal act of launching began before the ball hit the ground, even if the helmet wasn't actually hit yet.
Regardless, it seems like yet another stupid application of the rules.
SUGGESTIONS
I'm going to just keep beating this drum because it's getting so hard to watch these games:
1. If you must have a stupid taunting penalty, hedge the errors of applying it randomly, and make it less draconian. If taunting is really a concern, make it a 5 yard penalty and no automatic first down. In addition, give the player a warning, with the next one resulting in ejection. Problem solved, and the games will actually be decided by football and not refs incomplete understanding of the exchange and their ever changing sensitivity levels.
2. In addition, stop the 15 yard, automatic first down for any penalty that doesn't effect the game and doesn't pose a safety threat. Taunting has made all of this worse, but penalties are stupid in general with 15 yards awarded for things that don't actually have an impact on the game. The only 15 yard penalties should be for serious injury risk plays. A hand grazing a QB's helmet or a late push should be five yards; a blatant helmet to helmet should be 15 with the first down.
3. Make every play reviewable if the determination is based on a clear, unambiguous event. I don't think every play should be reviewable because the fact is, there's always going to be some intent-based calls, "know it when you see it" calls, context calls, etc. We saw how this was a disaster with the pass interference replay attempt. However, any play where the call is based on video evidence only should be reviewable. If a helmet to helmet hit occurs, it's a penalty and should be reviewable. If the defender hit the player's chest, it should be reversible. When a quarterback gets hit in the head, it's reviewable. When the defender actually didn't hit the head, it should be reversible. When a QB is out of bounds and gets hit, it should be a penalty. When the QB was not out of bounds first (like this year with Allen on the sidelines) a penalty should be reversible.
Last edited:
