- Joined
- Dec 2, 2005
- Messages
- 8,096
- Reaction score
- 15,454
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
Rosen wasn't good in college, he wasn't "good" when he was supposedly good.Stidham and Hoyer are so good that competition is totally unnecessary. Either one of these two is a winner, or we glorify in a 6-10 season and hope for a better QB AND backup[ next year.
yeah...if anything, he possesses Rat like quickness...perfect Jete backup IMOI fear Josh Rosen does not possess Cat like quickness
Rosen wasn't good in college, ..
He got the crap beaten out of him early on. Think he might have been a little gun shy.He threw 87 INTs in his 4 1/2 year Pat’s career (led the league in INTs one year, had 25 INTs another year). I think it was a combination of both.
This is true, as long as they hire someone else to do the math. I work best from home in my underwear.
Perhaps GM's and draft organizations should hire you instead of their folk.
yeah, I voted no but I thought his cap hit was going to be much more. At 2 mill this year and 3 next, I would give a fifth.
nobody knows what Rosen is or will be.
If we are taking a chance on an unproven qb, I would rather take a chance on a guy that has 12 plus months in our system!
Should the Patriots Trade For Josh Rosen? | Patriots Press Pass | CLNS Media
Evan Lazar seems pretty high on him. What does everyone think? I think he's talented but his attitude reminds me of Jay Cutler. For me personally, I would stick with Stidham, but I guess it wouldn't hurt to bring him in to compete if it's for a low pick.
It's not like Rosen would be replacing Stid, or even Hoyer, this season...If he's acquired - on waivers or for a late Day 3 pick - it is with 2021 in mind.nobody knows what Rosen is or will be.
If we are taking a chance on an unproven qb, I would rather take a chance on a guy that has 12 plus months in our system!
We're developing Stidham with 2021 in mind.It's not like Rosen would be replacing Stid, or even Hoyer, this season...If he's acquired - on waivers or for a late Day 3 pick - it is with 2021 in mind.
That couldn't be any further than the truth. Rosen was good in college.Rosen wasn't good in college, he wasn't "good" when he was supposedly good.
I give J'Mar Smith a Jacoby Brissett grade, that's his ceiling. So if you're saying Rosen or Smith, give me Smith all day... he costs nothing and hasn't been polluted by the Dolphins.
It's not that Rosen is ruined, it's that he was never that good to begin with, highly overrated prospect.
"Everyone" recognized his greatness because "everyone" largely consists of a bunch of baboons with degrees in journalism.That couldn't be any further than the truth. Rosen was good in college.
View attachment 27460
Was he GREAT, no, but he certainly wasn't NOT good, he was good. He was widely recognized as a high 1st round pick by EVERYONE coming into the 2018 draft.
Note that he has a $1.4M fully-guaranteed signing bonus due the first week of TC. And another $2.1M bonus next TC, also fully guaranteed. So basically he'd be getting more than Hoyer for the chance that he might work out.
You're right, with all the great talent he had around him, his stats should be much better, with the great Jordan Payton, Thomas Duarte & Darren Andrews. Add in the great Jordan Lasley. 59 TDs to 26 Ints isn't horrible. I'm not arguing he's great, I'm just saying he hasn't really been put in a good situation, let's see what he can do in the right situation."Everyone" recognized his greatness because "everyone" largely consists of a bunch of baboons with degrees in journalism.
60% completion rate, double digit INT's in two of his three seasons.... you realize the NFL is harder than college, not easier... right?
Huh?nobody knows what Rosen is or will be.
!