pheenix11
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Messages
- 5,151
- Reaction score
- 4,777
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I don't get the SF love. A Jimmy G Superbowl win would further validate how the Patriots screwed up his situation and could have extended the Dynasty for years to come. Additionally, I don't want a third team to have six Lombardi's.
The fix is in for the Saints now?Broadcast going out of their way to show all the penalties that could possibly be called against the Saints but aren’t.
Bold move Cotton.
I don't get the SF love. A Jimmy G Superbowl win would further validate how the Patriots screwed up his situation and could have extended the Dynasty for years to come. Additionally, I don't want a third team to have six Lombardi's.
The fix is in for the Saints now?
Not really. The Pats won 2 SuperBowls with Jimmy on the bench, and a 3rd one without him. There's no way he would've came back from 28-3, no way he would've pulled off what Brady did against Kansas City in the AFCCG -- and no reasonable way for them to have paid Jimmy a chunk of our cap space to sit on the bench and wait it out.I don't get the SF love. A Jimmy G Superbowl win would further validate how the Patriots screwed up his situation and could have extended the Dynasty for years to come. Additionally, I don't want a third team to have six Lombardi's.
Think about how much fun BB would have with a player like Hill. He loves that versatility.
Yeah, it’s a stunt. I was just messing with ya.No, it’s all ticky tacky shyt that could be called every play.
They’re just pushing the narrative “see how much the Saints got away with” for when they bend them over later in the game.
Not sure but he was somehow able to get open. Not sure what this sorcery is that the Saints are employing.Who was that rookie Saints WR?